These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212299)

  • 1. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness.
    Allen JB; Hall JL; Jeng PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):745-53. PubMed ID: 2212299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.
    Tyler RS; Conrad-Armes D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 6865383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal gap resolution in masked normal ears as a function of masker level.
    Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 6747113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid.
    Byrne D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 1986 Aug; 7(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 3743918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness of sounds with a subcritical bandwidth: a challenge to current loudness models?
    Hots J; Rennies J; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL334-9. PubMed ID: 24116539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in broadband noise.
    Schneider BA; Parker S
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 2300430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Würzburg auditory field, a test for prosthetic audiometry].
    Moser LM
    HNO; 1987 Aug; 35(8):318-21. PubMed ID: 3654279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):885-94. PubMed ID: 1939893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dependence of binaural loudness summation on interaural level differences, spectral distribution, and temporal distribution.
    Zwicker E; Zwicker UT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):756-64. PubMed ID: 2016430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot.
    Hicks ML; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling in normal-hearing subjects using pure-tone stimuli.
    Rasmussen AN; Olsen SO; Borgkvist BV; Nielsen LH
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 9728776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of loudness recalibration: implications for loudness enhancement.
    Arieh Y; Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1550-6. PubMed ID: 14514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold.
    Al-Salim SC; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Jesteadt W; Stiegemann B; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 20588122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3666-75. PubMed ID: 9193054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.