These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212308)

  • 1. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.
    Gaskill SA; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):821-39. PubMed ID: 2212308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):840-9. PubMed ID: 2212309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):850-6. PubMed ID: 2212310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios.
    He N; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3554-65. PubMed ID: 9193044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity: relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA; Carlyon RP; Williams DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3291-7. PubMed ID: 8326057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.
    He NJ; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2659-69. PubMed ID: 8270742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1587-607. PubMed ID: 1564196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.
    Harris FP; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Stagner BB; Coats AC; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 2921404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysical measures of two-tone suppression and distortion products (2f1-f2) and (f2-f1).
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):930-50. PubMed ID: 6841819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.