These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212308)

  • 21. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychophysical tuning curves for combination tones 2f1-f2 and f2-f1.
    Formby C; Sachs RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1754-8. PubMed ID: 7372931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The measurement of the lateralization of narrow bands of noise using an acoustic pointing paradigm: the effect of sound-pressure level.
    Simon HJ; Collins CC; Jampolsky A; Morledge DE; Yu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1534-47. PubMed ID: 8176057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High frequency distortion products from the ears of two bat species, Megaderma lyra and Carollia perspicillata.
    Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1992 Jul; 60(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 1639726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
    Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3431-44. PubMed ID: 9637030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.
    Knight RD; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):457-73. PubMed ID: 10641654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inner hair cell responses to the 2f1-f2 intermodulation distortion product.
    Nuttall AL; Dolan DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):782-90. PubMed ID: 2307775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears.
    Zurek PM; Clark WW; Kim DO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):774-80. PubMed ID: 7130536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard.
    Rosowski JJ; Peake WT; White JR
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 6715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phase delay measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 in human ears.
    Wable J; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2228-35. PubMed ID: 8865631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Suppression of human acoustic distortion product: dual origin of 2f1-f2.
    Gaskill SA; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3268-74. PubMed ID: 8914309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
    Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved.
    Puel JL; Rebillard G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1630-5. PubMed ID: 2341667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of aging on the fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product.
    He NJ; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1002-15. PubMed ID: 8609283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.