These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212309)

  • 1. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses.
    Brown AM; Gaskill SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):840-9. PubMed ID: 2212309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2f1-f2 distortion product.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):850-6. PubMed ID: 2212310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.
    Gaskill SA; Brown AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):821-39. PubMed ID: 2212308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1587-607. PubMed ID: 1564196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard.
    Rosowski JJ; Peake WT; White JR
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 6715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios.
    He N; Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3554-65. PubMed ID: 9193044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved.
    Puel JL; Rebillard G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1630-5. PubMed ID: 2341667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea.
    Kemp DT; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6706861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion in the cochlea: acoustic f2-f1 at low stimulus levels.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1993 Nov; 70(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 8294260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Hoover BM; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of olivocochlear bundle transection on tuning curves and acoustic distortion products.
    Littman TA; Cullen JK; Bobbin RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1945-52. PubMed ID: 1401539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of acoustic distortion products in clinical diagnosis. The site of origin of otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear].
    Plinkert PK; Harris FP; Probst R
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):339-44. PubMed ID: 8376180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials.
    Salt AN; Vora AR
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.