These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is peri-operative urethral catheter drainage enough? The case for stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty. Silva MV; Levy AC; Finkelstein JB; Van Batavia JP; Casale P J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Aug; 11(4):175.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26189590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons. Spampinato G; Binet A; Fourcade L; Mendoza Sagaon M; Villemagne T; Braik K; Grosos C; Lardy H; Ballouhey Q J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-483. PubMed ID: 33651635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotics and future technical developments in pediatric urology. Esposito C; Autorino G; Castagnetti M; Cerulo M; Coppola V; Cardone R; Esposito G; Borgogni R; Escolino M Semin Pediatr Surg; 2021 Aug; 30(4):151082. PubMed ID: 34412879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no. Lotan Y Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 22080872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study. O'Brien ST; Shukla AR J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children. Barbosa JA; Barayan G; Gridley CM; Sanchez DC; Passerotti CC; Houck CS; Nguyen HT J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):244-50. PubMed ID: 23276511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]