These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22123541)

  • 1. Objective quantification of subjective parameters in scars by use of a portable stereophotographic system.
    Lumenta DB; Kitzinger HB; Selig H; Kamolz LP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 Dec; 67(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 22123541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective quantification of subjective parameters in scars by use of a portable stereophotographic system.
    Henseler H; Vogt P
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Nov; 69(5):588-9; author reply 589-90. PubMed ID: 23044755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment.
    Draaijers LJ; Botman YA; Tempelman FR; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15019116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective and quantitative evaluation of scar color using the L*a*b* color coordinates.
    Cheon YW; Lee WJ; Rah DK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):679-84. PubMed ID: 20485028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital imaging analysis of scar aesthetics.
    Valente JH; Jay GD; Schmidt ST; Oh AK; Reinert SE; Zabbo CP
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Mar; 25(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 22343599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars.
    Bloemen MC; van Gerven MS; van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):706-15. PubMed ID: 21216493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successful treatment of atrophic postoperative and traumatic scarring with carbon dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing: quantitative volumetric scar improvement.
    Weiss ET; Chapas A; Brightman L; Hunzeker C; Hale EK; Karen JK; Bernstein L; Geronemus RG
    Arch Dermatol; 2010 Feb; 146(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 20157023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study.
    O'Connell DA; Diamond C; Seikaly H; Harris JR
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan; 134(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 18209143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.
    Brown BC; Moss TP; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A reliable, non-invasive measurement tool for anisotropy in normal skin and scar tissue.
    Verhaegen PD; Res EM; van Engelen A; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Skin Res Technol; 2010 Aug; 16(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 20637002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of topical cyanoacrylates compared to topical silicone gel in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.
    Scuderi N; Dessy LA; Mazzocchi M; Chiummariello S; Onesti MG
    In Vivo; 2010; 24(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 20668330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective evaluation of burn and post-surgical scars and the accuracy of subjective scar type judgment.
    Wang ZY; Zhang J; Lu SL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2517-20. PubMed ID: 19187588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pilot randomized control trial of scar repigmentation with UV light and dry tattooing.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Conlin AE; Stein JD; Doyle PC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 19041501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
    Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of nonablative laser technology.
    Friedman PM; Skover GR; Payonk G; Geronemus RG
    Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2002 Dec; 21(4):266-73. PubMed ID: 12512649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.