These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22124521)

  • 1. Diagnostic errors from digital stitching of scoliosis images - the importance of evaluating the source images prior to making a final diagnosis.
    Supakul N; Newbrough K; Cohen MD; Jennings SG
    Pediatr Radiol; 2012 May; 42(5):584-98. PubMed ID: 22124521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A stitch in time: stitching errors in digital radiology.
    Faurie C; Williams N; Cundy PJ
    Med J Aust; 2017 Aug; 207(5):224. PubMed ID: 28987139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scoliosis evaluation by direct digital radiography and computerized post-processing.
    Berliner L; Kreang-Arekul S; Kaufman L
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():270-4. PubMed ID: 12105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI May Serve as a Valid Alternative to Standing Radiography in Evaluating the Sagittal Alignment of the Upper Thoracic Spine.
    Wang F; Sun X; Mao S; Liu Z; Qiao J; Zhu F; Zhu Z; Pan T; Chen L; Zhao Q; Qiu Y
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):124-128. PubMed ID: 28323691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose reduction in scoliosis patients: low-dose full-spine radiography with digital flat panel detector and image stitching system.
    Grieser T; Baldauf AQ; Ludwig K
    Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 21614741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First test on three stitching methods with digital detectors used in radiography.
    Bassi S; Baldini S; Rebuffat C; Sarti R; Ferretti F
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jan; 6(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 23143713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of automated image stitching system for DR X-ray images.
    Yang F; He Y; Deng ZS; Yan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():108-14. PubMed ID: 26914239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and reliability of a computer method to estimate vertebral axial rotation from digital radiographs.
    Pinheiro AP; Tanure MC; Oliveira AS
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Mar; 19(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 19820970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis.
    Aubin CE; Bellefleur C; Joncas J; de Lanauze D; Kadoury S; Blanke K; Parent S; Labelle H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(12):E780-90. PubMed ID: 21224755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose for pediatric scoliosis patients undergoing whole spine radiography: Effect of the radiographic length in an auto-stitching digital radiography system.
    Hwang YS; Lai PL; Tsai HY; Kung YC; Lin YY; He RJ; Wu CT
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():99-106. PubMed ID: 30396678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The correlation comparison of vertebral axial rotation relative to curvature and torsion in scoliosis by simplified 3D spine model.
    Lin H
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1517-20. PubMed ID: 17945649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seamless image stitching by minimizing false edges.
    Zomet A; Levin A; Peleg S; Weiss Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2006 Apr; 15(4):969-77. PubMed ID: 16579382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [SLOT Scan imaging in teenagers with scoliosis].
    Situ W; Li Y; Li Z; Hu Z; He J
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Jul; 34(7):675-9. PubMed ID: 19648686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
    Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical magnification error in lateral spinal digital radiographs.
    Ravi B; Rampersaud R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):E311-6. PubMed ID: 18449031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition.
    Wills BP; Auerbach JD; Zhu X; Caird MS; Horn BD; Flynn JM; Drummond DS; Dormans JP; Ecker ML
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.
    Shea KG; Stevens PM; Nelson M; Smith JT; Masters KS; Yandow S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 9530786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fixed lumbar apical vertebral rotation predicts spinal decompensation in Lenke type 3C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion.
    Behensky H; Cole AA; Freeman BJ; Grevitt MP; Mehdian HS; Webb JK
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1570-8. PubMed ID: 17520294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.