These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22124610)

  • 1. Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years.
    Chen X; Du M; Fan M; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1443-50. PubMed ID: 22124610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.
    Zhang W; Chen X; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017; 15(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 28752157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
    Chen X; Du MQ; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.
    Chen X; Cuijpers V; Fan M; Frencken JE
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X; Zhang W; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial.
    Zhang W; Chen X; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2014 May; 30(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24602520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria.
    Hilgert LA; Leal SC; Freire GML; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 May; 31():e35. PubMed ID: 28513786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial.
    Baseggio W; Naufel FS; Davidoff DC; Nahsan FP; Flury S; Rodrigues JA
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-year clinical evaluation of a Glass Carbomer fissure sealant, a preliminary study.
    Gorseta K; Glavina D; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Van Duinen RN; Skrinjaric I; Hill RG; Lynch E
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Jun; 22(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 25134364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods and preliminary findings of a cost-effectiveness study of glass-ionomer-based and composite resin sealant materials after 2 yr.
    Goldman AS; Chen X; Fan M; Frencken JE
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 122(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 24799118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Alsabek L; Al-Nerabieah Z; Bshara N; Comisi JC
    J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():69-74. PubMed ID: 31136817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examination of a resin-modified glass-ionomer material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Johnson LM; Duke ES; Camm J; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Dec; 26(12):879-83. PubMed ID: 8596819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glass-ionomer fissure sealants: Clinical observations up to 13 years.
    Markovic D; Peric T; Petrovic B
    J Dent; 2018 Dec; 79():85-89. PubMed ID: 30352257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.
    Beresescu L; Kovacs M; Vlasa A; Stoica AM; Benedek C; Pop M; Bungardean D; Eșian D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and SEM assessment of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants after 8-13 years in 4 teeth.
    Frencken JE; Wolke J
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19748548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.
    Oba AA; Dülgergil T; Sönmez IS; Doğan S
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The state-of-the-art of ART sealants.
    Frencken JE
    Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):119-20, 122-4. PubMed ID: 24783880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study.
    Mejàre I; Mjör IA
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Aug; 98(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 2144660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.