176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212464)
1. Informed consent for presbyopic contact lens patients.
Harris MG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):717-22. PubMed ID: 2212464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinicolegal considerations of monovision.
Harris MG; Classé JG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 3403894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent in contact lens practice.
Harris MG; Dister RE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Mar; 58(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 3471807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates.
Westin E; Wick B; Harrist RB
Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):757-63. PubMed ID: 11145300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of fitting presbyopic patients with contact lenses.
Kuhl SA; Henry VA; Bennett ES
J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Mar; 63(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 1583278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monovision vs. aspheric bifocal contact lenses: a crossover study.
Josephson JE; Caffery BE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Aug; 58(8):652-4. PubMed ID: 3624759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monovision: a review.
Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 17718882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for extended-wear patients.
Harris MG; Dister RE
Optom Clin; 1991; 1(3):33-50. PubMed ID: 1797239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liability and extended wear contact lenses.
Classé JG; Harris MG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Oct; 58(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 3316353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding liability in contact lens practice.
Classé JG
Optom Clin; 1994; 4(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7812060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physiology of aging and its influence on the contact lens prescription.
Benjamin WJ; Borish IM
J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Oct; 62(10):743-53. PubMed ID: 1813499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent in optometric institutions.
Werner DL
J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Jun; 65(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 8089389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bifocal hydrogel lenses: an overview.
Josephson JE; Caffery B
J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Mar; 57(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 3958417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses.
Callina T; Reynolds TP
Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recordkeeping and contact lens practice.
Classé JG
Optom Clin; 1994; 4(1):69-91. PubMed ID: 7812068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
Bachman WG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Tangent Streak rigid gas permeable bifocal contact lens.
Remba MJ
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 3351189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]