225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22124708)
1. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.
Watanabe S; Inoue N; Yamaguchi T; Hirano Y; Espinoza Orías AA; Nishida S; Hirose Y; Mizuno J
Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):946-55. PubMed ID: 22124708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients: clinical article.
McDonald CP; Chang V; McDonald M; Ramo N; Bey MJ; Bartol S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24359000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion.
Prasarn ML; Baria D; Milne E; Latta L; Sukovich W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22136389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.
Ren J; Li R; Zhu K; Han X; Liu X; He Y; Sun Z
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Mar; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 30832736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.
Kim SW; Limson MA; Kim SB; Arbatin JJ; Chang KY; Park MS; Shin JH; Ju YS
Eur Spine J; 2009 Feb; 18(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 19127374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.
Park Y; Maeda T; Cho W; Riew KD
Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chien A; Lai DM; Wang SF; Cheng CH; Hsu WL; Wang JL
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2857-65. PubMed ID: 25860996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
Auerbach JD; Anakwenze OA; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Hipp J; Norvell DC; Raich A; Hashimoto R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S85-95. PubMed ID: 22885834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
Powell JW; Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA; Hipp JA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjacent segment motion following multi-level ACDF: a kinematic and clinical study in patients with zero-profile anchored spacer or plate.
Cui W; Wu B; Liu B; Li D; Wang L; Ma S
Eur Spine J; 2019 Oct; 28(10):2408-2416. PubMed ID: 31428860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
