These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22124890)

  • 1. Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.
    Ewert SD; Kaiser K; Kernschmidt L; Wiegrebe L
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 22124890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.
    Monaghan JJ; Bleeck S; McAlpine D
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. II. Responses to band-pass filtered noises.
    Chan JC; Yin TC; Musicant AD
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Sep; 58(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 3655882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences.
    Joris PX; Yin TC
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 73(3):1043-62. PubMed ID: 7608754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuronal sensitivity to interaural time differences in the sound envelope in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat.
    Lohuis TD; Fuzessery ZM
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):43-57. PubMed ID: 10771183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences.
    Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 8395589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaural time sensitivity dominated by cochlea-induced envelope patterns.
    Joris PX
    J Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 23(15):6345-50. PubMed ID: 12867519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human cortical sensitivity to interaural time difference in high-frequency sounds.
    Salminen NH; Altoè A; Takanen M; Santala O; Pulkki V
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():99-106. PubMed ID: 25668126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory processing of interaural timing information: new insights.
    Bernstein LR
    J Neurosci Res; 2001 Dec; 66(6):1035-46. PubMed ID: 11746435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Localization of broadband sounds carrying interaural time differences: Effects of frequency, reference location, and interaural coherence.
    Buchholz JM; Le Goff N; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Oct; 144(4):2225. PubMed ID: 30404466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.
    Griffin SJ; Bernstein LR; Ingham NJ; McAlpine D
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3463-78. PubMed ID: 15703234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. III. Evidence for cross-correlation.
    Yin TC; Chan JC; Carney LH
    J Neurophysiol; 1987 Sep; 58(3):562-83. PubMed ID: 3655883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Körtje M; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241015. PubMed ID: 33075114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-frequency-dependent dominance of sound localization cues across the cochleotopic map of the inferior colliculus.
    Dorkoski R; Hancock KE; Whaley GA; Wohl TR; Stroud NC; Day ML
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1791-1807. PubMed ID: 32186439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.