These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22127378)

  • 1. Adverse response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with septal scar on cardiac MRI preventing a septal right ventricular lead position.
    Duckett SG; Ginks M; Shetty A; Kirubakaran S; Bostock J; Kapetanakis S; Gill J; Carr-White G; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Mar; 33(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 22127378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Wong JA; Yee R; Stirrat J; Scholl D; Krahn AD; Gula LJ; Skanes AC; Leong-Sit P; Klein GJ; McCarty D; Fine N; Goela A; Islam A; Thompson T; Drangova M; White JA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 6(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 23741053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scar burden by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Adelstein EC; Saba S
    Am Heart J; 2007 Jan; 153(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 17174647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Duckett SG; Ginks M; Shetty AK; Bostock J; Gill JS; Hamid S; Kapetanakis S; Cunliffe E; Razavi R; Carr-White G; Rinaldi CA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(11):1128-36. PubMed ID: 21884950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left ventricular lead position, mechanical activation, and myocardial scar in relation to left ventricular reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A feature-tracking and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Taylor RJ; Umar F; Panting JR; Stegemann B; Leyva F
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):481-9. PubMed ID: 26498258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Focal But Not Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis Burden Quantification Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Left Ventricular Reverse Modeling Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Chen Z; Sohal M; Sammut E; Child N; Jackson T; Claridge S; Cooklin M; O'Neill M; Wright M; Gill J; Chiribiri A; Schaeffter T; Carr-White G; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 26463874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of the Association of Septal Scar Burden on Responses to LBBAP-CRT and BVP-CRT.
    Chen Z; Ma X; Wu S; Gao Y; Song Y; Lu M; Dai Y; Zhang S; Hua W; Gold MR; Zhao S; Chen K
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Jul; 10(7 Pt 1):1439-1451. PubMed ID: 38727661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biventricular endocardial pacing and left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronization: Mechanistic insights from electrocardiographic imaging, acute hemodynamic response, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Elliott MK; Strocchi M; Sieniewicz BJ; Sidhu B; Mehta V; Wijesuriya N; Behar JM; Thorpe A; Martic D; Wong T; Niederer S; Rinaldi CA
    Heart Rhythm; 2023 Feb; 20(2):207-216. PubMed ID: 36575808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of myocardial scarring on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy: extent or location?
    Xu YZ; Cha YM; Feng D; Powell BD; Wiste HJ; Hua W; Chareonthaitawee P
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Jan; 53(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 22159181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived anatomy, scar, and dyssynchrony fused with fluoroscopy to guide LV lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with acute haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic reverse remodelling.
    Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Ginks MR; Ma Y; Sohal M; Bostock J; Kapetanakis S; Singh JP; Rhode K; Wright M; O'Neill MD; Gill JS; Carr-White G; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 14(7):692-9. PubMed ID: 23175695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanism of Abnormal Septal Motion in Left Bundle Branch Block: Role of Left Ventricular Wall Interactions and Myocardial Scar.
    Aalen JM; Remme EW; Larsen CK; Andersen OS; Krogh M; Duchenne J; Hopp E; Ross S; Beela AS; Kongsgaard E; Bergsland J; Odland HH; Skulstad H; Opdahl A; Voigt JU; Smiseth OA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2402-2413. PubMed ID: 30772230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
    Mendonca Costa C; Neic A; Kerfoot E; Porter B; Sieniewicz B; Gould J; Sidhu B; Chen Z; Plank G; Rinaldi CA; Bishop MJ; Niederer SA
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1475-1483. PubMed ID: 30930329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Adelstein EC; Tanaka H; Soman P; Miske G; Haberman SC; Saba SF; Gorcsan J
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jan; 32(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 20971745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
    Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right, but not left, bundle branch block is associated with large anteroseptal scar.
    Strauss DG; Loring Z; Selvester RH; Gerstenblith G; Tomaselli G; Weiss RG; Wagner GS; Wu KC
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 62(11):959-67. PubMed ID: 23707313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized study of haemodynamic effects and left ventricular dyssynchrony in right ventricular apical vs. high posterior septal pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Kristiansen HM; Vollan G; Hovstad T; Keilegavlen H; Faerestrand S
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2012 May; 14(5):506-16. PubMed ID: 22286156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.
    Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A;
    Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longer inter-lead electrical delay is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with presumed optimal left ventricular lead position.
    Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Nørgaard BL; Stephansen C; Poulsen SH; Kristensen J; Gerdes C; Nielsen JC
    Europace; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1630-1637. PubMed ID: 29377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of low-amplitude two-dimensional radial strain at left ventricular pacing sites on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Khan FZ; Virdee MS; Read PA; Pugh PJ; O'Halloran D; Fahey M; Elsik M; Begley D; Fynn SP; Dutka DP
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Nov; 23(11):1168-76. PubMed ID: 20888187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of myocardial scar characterization to predict ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Fernández-Armenta J; Berruezo A; Mont L; Sitges M; Andreu D; Silva E; Ortiz-Pérez JT; Tolosana JM; de Caralt TM; Perea RJ; Calvo N; Trucco E; Borràs R; Matas M; Brugada J
    Europace; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1578-86. PubMed ID: 22562658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.