130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212780)
21. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Third replacement of the tricuspid valve in combined aortic-tricuspid defect].
Spitzer S; Schwerdt H; Vogel W; Stoll HP; Fröhlig G; Volkmer I; Kalweit G; Schieffer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Nov; 79(11):797-801. PubMed ID: 2278173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Jamming of prosthetic heart valves by suture trapping: experimental findings.
van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Reul H; Knott E; Vincent JG; Lacquet LK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Oct; 37(5):288-93. PubMed ID: 2588246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.
Walker DK; Brendzel AM; Scotten LN
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Hemodynamic assessment of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve compared with the St. Jude Medical valve in the aortic position using dobutamine-stress echocardiography].
Oda T; Fukunaga S; Arinaga K; Kawano H; Chihara S; Yokose S; Onitsuka S; Sakashita H; Aoyagi S
Kyobu Geka; 2000 Apr; 53(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 10770062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Tricuspid valve replacement by Hancock's prosthesis].
Delahaye JP; Rondepierre D; Gaspard P; Mikaeloff P; Chassignolle JF; Bourdillon MC; Milon H
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Mar; 74(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 6782988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Clinical assessment of prosthetic valve replacement of the right-sided cardiac valves: mechanical or bioprosthesis?].
Masuda M; Kawachi Y; Oe M; Tominaga R; Kinoshita K; Nakashima A; Asou T; Toshima Y; Tanaka J; Tokunaga K
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 37(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 2768918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hemodynamic comparison of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprosthetic valves.
Khan S; Mitchell RS; Derby GC; Oyer PE; Miller DC
Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV75-81. PubMed ID: 2225438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A database obtained from in vitro function testing of mechanical heart valves.
Walker DK; Scotten LN
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):561-70. PubMed ID: 8000593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Surgical management of valve replacement in children].
Kanazawa H; Miyamura H; Watanabe H; Sugawara M; Takahashi Y; Shinonaga M; Tatebe S; Hayashi J; Eguchi S
Kyobu Geka; 1991 Oct; 44(11):887-92; discussion 892-5. PubMed ID: 1942678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo hemodynamics of prosthetic St. Jude Medical and Ionescu-Shiley heart valves analyzed by computer.
Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K; Watanabe Y; Nose Y; Nakamura M
Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 May; 39(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 3994447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In-vitro measurements of the regurgitation of mechanical mitral heart valve prostheses in case of atrial fibrillation.
Mouret F; Garitey V; Fuseri J; Rieu R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):264-8. PubMed ID: 11297214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Continuous wave Doppler assessment of prosthetic valves in the mitral position: comparison of the St. Jude medical mechanical valve and the porcine xenograft valve].
Kisanuki A; Tei C; Arikawa K; Natsugoe K; Otsuji Y; Kawazoe Y; Tanaka H; Morishita Y; Maruko M; Taira A
J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1119-27. PubMed ID: 3841894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
