110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22128325)
1. Computerized method for automatic evaluation of lean body mass from PET/CT: comparison with predictive equations.
Chan T
J Nucl Med; 2012 Jan; 53(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 22128325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lean body mass correction of standardized uptake value in simultaneous whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Jochimsen TH; Schulz J; Busse H; Werner P; Schaudinn A; Zeisig V; Kurch L; Seese A; Barthel H; Sattler B; Sabri O
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4651-64. PubMed ID: 26020722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid Standardized CT-Based Method to Determine Lean Body Mass SUV for PET-A Significant Improvement Over Prediction Equations.
Riauka TA; Baracos VE; Reif R; Juengling FD; Robinson DM; Wieler M; McEwan AJB
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():812777. PubMed ID: 35875083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-specific lean body mass can be estimated from limited-coverage computed tomography images.
Devriese J; Beels L; Maes A; van de Wiele C; Pottel H
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jun; 39(6):521-526. PubMed ID: 29672462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of MRI Dixon-Based Attenuation Correction in Combined PET/MR with Applications for Lean Body Mass Estimation.
Rausch I; Rust P; DiFranco MD; Lassen M; Stadlbauer A; Mayerhoefer ME; Hartenbach M; Hacker M; Beyer T
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1096-101. PubMed ID: 26917707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies.
Erselcan T; Turgut B; Dogan D; Ozdemir S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1630-8. PubMed ID: 12458398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Method to Improve the Semiquantification of 18F-FDG Uptake: Reliability of the Estimated Lean Body Mass Using the Conventional, Low-Dose CT from PET/CT.
Decazes P; Métivier D; Rouquette A; Talbot JN; Kerrou K
J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):753-8. PubMed ID: 26719376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for evaluation of patient-specific lean body mass from limited-coverage CT images and its application in PERCIST: comparison with predictive equation.
Shang J; Tan Z; Cheng Y; Tang Y; Guo B; Gong J; Ling X; Wang L; Xu H
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):12. PubMed ID: 33555478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Existing equations to estimate lean body mass are not accurate in the critically ill: Results of a multicenter observational study.
Moisey LL; Mourtzakis M; Kozar RA; Compher C; Heyland DK
Clin Nutr; 2017 Dec; 36(6):1701-1706. PubMed ID: 27697303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic anatomy recognition in whole-body PET/CT images.
Wang H; Udupa JK; Odhner D; Tong Y; Zhao L; Torigian DA
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):613. PubMed ID: 26745953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of CT-based SUV normalization.
Devriese J; Beels L; Maes A; Van de Wiele C; Pottel H
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6369-83. PubMed ID: 27498994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of CT-based lean-body SUV.
Hamill JJ; Sunderland JJ; LeBlanc AK; Kojima CJ; Wall J; Martin EB
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):092504. PubMed ID: 24007180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.
Kim JH; Lee JS; Song IC; Lee DS
J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1878-82. PubMed ID: 23081993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system.
Strobel K; Rüdy M; Treyer V; Veit-Haibach P; Burger C; Hany TF
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 17538397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct Determination of Lean Body Mass by CT in F-18 FDG PET/CT Studies: Comparison with Estimates Using Predictive Equations.
Kim CG; Kim WH; Kim MH; Kim DW
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jun; 47(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24900089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated and robust PERCIST-based thresholding framework for whole body PET-CT studies.
Bi L; Kim J; Wen L; Feng DD
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5335-8. PubMed ID: 23367134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uptake in supraclavicular area fat ("USA-Fat"): description on 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Cohade C; Osman M; Pannu HK; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12571205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
