158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22128537)
21. Removal of multiple pesticides from water by different types of membranes.
Seah MQ; Ng ZC; Lai GS; Lau WJ; Al-Ghouti MA; Alias NH; Ismail AF
Chemosphere; 2024 May; 356():141960. PubMed ID: 38604517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adsorption of pharmaceuticals onto isolated polyamide active layer of NF/RO membranes.
Liu YL; Wang XM; Yang HW; Xie YF
Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():36-47. PubMed ID: 29471167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of organic fouling on the removal of radionuclides by reverse osmosis membranes.
Ding S; Yang Y; Li C; Huang H; Hou LA
Water Res; 2016 May; 95():174-84. PubMed ID: 26994696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rejection of pharmaceutically-based N-nitrosodimethylamine precursors using nanofiltration.
Woods GC; Sadmani AHMA; Andrews SA; Bagley DM; Andrews RC
Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():179-186. PubMed ID: 26905796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water.
Verliefde AR; Heijman SG; Cornelissen ER; Amy G; Van der Bruggen B; van Dijk JC
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3227-40. PubMed ID: 17583761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of operating parameters on spiramycin removal by nanofiltration membrane.
Zhao C; Fan W; Wang T; Hou D; Luan Z
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1512-9. PubMed ID: 24135099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: a review.
Shen J; Schäfer A
Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():679-91. PubMed ID: 25461935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recent progress in the applications of layer-by-layer assembly to the preparation of nanostructured ion-rejecting water purification membranes.
Sanyal O; Lee I
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Mar; 14(3):2178-89. PubMed ID: 24745210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Removal of Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution and industrial effluent using reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.
Kheriji J; Tabassi D; Hamrouni B
Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(7):1206-16. PubMed ID: 26398037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Wastewater from wood and pulp industry treated by combination of coagulation, adsorption on modified clinoptilolite tuff and membrane processes.
Bennani Y; Kosutić K; Drazević E; Rozeć M
Environ Technol; 2012 Jun; 33(10-12):1159-66. PubMed ID: 22856285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
Bellona C; Drewes JE
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Nanofiltration Decision Tool for Potable Reuse: A New Rejection Model for Recalcitrant CECs.
Jones SM; Watts MJ; Wickramasinghe SR
Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 28577313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
Schäfer AI; Nghiem LD; Waite TD
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Jan; 37(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 12542309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
