These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22128798)

  • 1. Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Alemayehu D; Cappelleri JC
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 22128798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology methodology: observational data.
    Hershman DL; Wright JD
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4215-22. PubMed ID: 23071228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
    Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The utility of observational studies in clinical decision making: lessons learned from statin trials.
    Foody JM; Mendys PM; Liu LZ; Simpson RJ
    Postgrad Med; 2010 May; 122(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 20463433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
    Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Albert RK
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23725614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part III.
    Johnson ML; Crown W; Martin BC; Dormuth CR; Siebert U
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1062-73. PubMed ID: 19793071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality standards for real-world research. Focus on observational database studies of comparative effectiveness.
    Roche N; Reddel H; Martin R; Brusselle G; Papi A; Thomas M; Postma D; Thomas V; Rand C; Chisholm A; Price D;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2014 Feb; 11 Suppl 2():S99-104. PubMed ID: 24559028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observational study designs for comparative effectiveness research: an alternative approach to close evidence gaps in head-and-neck cancer.
    Goulart BH; Ramsey SD; Parvathaneni U
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 24331656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential bias of instrumental variable analyses for observational comparative effectiveness research.
    Garabedian LF; Chu P; Toh S; Zaslavsky AM; Soumerai SB
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 161(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 25023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.
    Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report.
    Berger ML; Dreyer N; Anderson F; Towse A; Sedrakyan A; Normand SL
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 22433752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.
    Bellows BK; Biskupiak J
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2011; 25(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21882980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tools for health care decision making: observational studies, modeling studies, and network meta-analyses.
    Aronson N; Grant MD
    Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 24636372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative effectiveness research: guidelines for good practices are just the beginning.
    Johnson ML; Chitnis AS
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Feb; 11(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 21351858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.
    Dreyer NA; Tunis SR; Berger M; Ollendorf D; Mattox P; Gliklich R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1818-25. PubMed ID: 20921481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.