449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22129640)
1. Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort.
González-Macías J; Marin F; Vila J; Díez-Pérez A
Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 22129640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women.
Tebé Cordomí C; Del Río LM; Di Gregorio S; Casas L; Estrada MD; Kotzeva A; Espallargues M
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 22748778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.
Azagra R; Roca G; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Zwart M; Güell S; Puchol N; Gene E; Casado E; Sancho P; Solà S; Torán P; Iglesias M; Gisbert MC; López-Expósito F; Pujol-Salud J; Fernandez-Hermida Y; Puente A; Rosàs M; Bou V; Antón JJ; Lansdberg G; Martín-Sánchez JC; Díez-Pérez A; Prieto-Alhambra D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():204. PubMed ID: 23088223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.
Yu R; Leung J; Woo J
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The FRAX tool in French women: How well does it describe the real incidence of fracture in the OFELY cohort?
Sornay-Rendu E; Munoz F; Delmas PD; Chapurlat RD
J Bone Miner Res; 2010 Oct; 25(10):2101-7. PubMed ID: 20499352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputation of 10-year osteoporotic fracture rates from hip fractures: a clinical validation study.
Leslie WD; Lix LM;
J Bone Miner Res; 2010 Feb; 25(2):388-92. PubMed ID: 19653809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study.
Rubin KH; Abrahamsen B; Friis-Holmberg T; Hjelmborg JV; Bech M; Hermann AP; Barkmann R; Glüer CC; Brixen K
Bone; 2013 Sep; 56(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23669650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the FRAX model for hip fracture predictions in the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE).
Sund R; Honkanen R; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey E; Kanis J; Kröger H
Calcif Tissue Int; 2014 Jul; 95(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 24792689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
Tamaki J; Iki M; Kadowaki E; Sato Y; Kajita E; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Yoneshima H
Osteoporos Int; 2011 Dec; 22(12):3037-45. PubMed ID: 21279504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture risk prediction using phalangeal bone mineral density or FRAX(®)?-A Danish cohort study on men and women.
Friis-Holmberg T; Rubin KH; Brixen K; Tolstrup JS; Bech M
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23623379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women.
Leslie WD; Brennan SL; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23929269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture burden in relation to low bone mineral density and FRAX(®) probability.
Leslie WD; Morin S
J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 21723761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAXTM), where are we in Tunisia?].
Zrour-Hassen S; Jguirim M; Guezguez M; Mnif H; Younes M; Bejia I; Touzi M; Abid A; Essabah H; Bergaoui N
Tunis Med; 2011 Feb; 89(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 21308620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of hip fracture in Romania and the development of a Romanian FRAX model.
Grigorie D; Sucaliuc A; Johansson H; Kanis JA; McCloskey E
Calcif Tissue Int; 2013 May; 92(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 23334302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The characteristics of osteoporotic fractures in the region of Bialystok (BOS-2). The application of the WHO algorithm, FRAX®BMI and FRAX®BMD assessment tools to determine patients for intervention.
Badurski J; Jeziernicka E; Dobreńko A; Nowak N; Daniluk S; Rybaczuk M; Wiśniowiecka M
Endokrynol Pol; 2011; 62(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 21879467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
