493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2212968)
1. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
Iyriboz Y
J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring.
Roeder RA; Geddes LA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of invasive blood pressure measurement in the aorta with indirect oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the wrist and forearm].
Saul F; Aristidou Y; Klaus D; Wiemeyer A; Lösse B
Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):675-85. PubMed ID: 8525669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
Loubser PG
Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Blood pressure measurement using the fingers].
Grüne S; Spühler T; Edmonds D; Binswanger B; Weisser B; Mendgen T; Vetter W
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1992 Jan; 81(5):103-5. PubMed ID: 1734486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of sphygmomanometric and oscillometric methods of blood pressure measurements in adult in-patients.
Amadasun FE; Isa JI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2005 Dec; 8(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 16477859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-based differences between mercury sphygmomanometer and pulse dynamic blood pressure measurements.
Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Yajnik AK; Chio SS
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 10212342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
