These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2213000)

  • 1. A test of perceptual enhancement with peripherally presented letter pairs.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jul; 117(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 2213000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter identification and lateral masking in dyslexic and average readers.
    Goolkasian P; King J
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(4):519-38. PubMed ID: 2275487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of peripheral vision in implicit contextual cuing.
    van Asselen M; Castelo-Branco M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 19304598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fixation and attention control in lateralised target detection and free recall with words.
    Voyer D; Boles DB
    Laterality; 2007 Sep; 12(5):428-48. PubMed ID: 17712713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach].
    Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently.
    Grainger J; Tydgat I; Isselé J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):673-88. PubMed ID: 20515197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foveal-to-peripheral priming in letter identification reflects response bias, not enhanced visibility.
    Laarni J; Nyman G
    Scand J Psychol; 1996 Dec; 37(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 8931394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention alters visual plasticity during exposure-based learning.
    Gutnisky DA; Hansen BJ; Iliescu BF; Dragoi V
    Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(7):555-60. PubMed ID: 19268592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging, memory and visual search.
    Kramer AF; Boot WR; McCarley JS; Peterson MS; Colcombe A; Scialfa CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):288-304. PubMed ID: 16438921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in infant visual attention: recognition of degraded visual forms by four-month-olds.
    Frick JE; Colombo J
    Child Dev; 1996 Feb; 67(1):188-204. PubMed ID: 8605827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.
    Lubow RE; Tsal Y; Mirkin A; Mazliah G
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of peripheral visual images in a laterally restricted gaze field.
    Semmlow JL; Gauthier GM; Vercher JL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 2326117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the importance of letter pairs in reading-parafoveal processing is not the only view: reply to Inhoff, Radach, Eiter, and Skelly (2003).
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM; Patching GR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):900-3. PubMed ID: 14516223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced discrimination of novel, highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task.
    Plaisted K; O'Riordan M; Baron-Cohen S
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1998 Jul; 39(5):765-75. PubMed ID: 9690939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and proprioceptive recognition of cursive letters in young children.
    Vinter A; Chartrel E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 18599004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory factors are insufficient to define the ocular saccade goal in complex visual fields.
    Lévy-Schoen A; Coëffé C; Jacobs AM
    Brain Behav Evol; 1989; 33(2-3):80-4. PubMed ID: 2758306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.