These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22130062)

  • 1. Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task.
    Schapmire DW; St James JD; Townsend R; Feeler L
    Work; 2011; 40(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22130062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.
    Reneman MF; Jaegers SM; Westmaas M; Göeken LN
    Work; 2002; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12441588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occupational lifting by nursing aides and warehouse workers.
    Ljungberg AS; Kilbom A; Hägg GM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 2924762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic lifting capacity: the relationship between peak force and weight as an indicator of effort.
    Hazard RG; Reeves V; Weisman G; Fleming BC; Pope MH
    J Spinal Disord; 1991 Mar; 4(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 1839668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.
    Stevenson JM; Andrew GM; Bryant JT; Greenhorn DR; Thomson JM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Feb; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 2714247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An electromyographic analysis of seated and standing lifting tasks.
    Yates JW; Karwowski W
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):889-98. PubMed ID: 1633795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical exploration on dynamic modes of lifting.
    Gagnon M; Smyth G
    Ergonomics; 1992 Mar; 35(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 1572341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of subjective perception of exertion in the evaluation of the tolerance to repetitive lifting: a pilot study].
    Capodaglio P; Capodaglio EM; Bazzini G
    G Ital Med Lav; 1996; 18(1-3):7-12. PubMed ID: 9312447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived exertion during patient lifts. An evaluation of the importance of various factors for the subjective strain during lifting and carrying of patients. A study at a geriatric hospital.
    Dehlin O; Jäderberg E
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1982; 14(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 7063816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for asymmetric lifting.
    Cheng TS; Lee TH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):1339-46. PubMed ID: 12929792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of load on biomechanics during an overhead lift in the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation.
    Allen JL; James C; Snodgrass SJ
    Work; 2012; 43(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 22927589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method and performance: two elements of work technique.
    Kjellberg K; Lindbeck L; Hagberg M
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):798-816. PubMed ID: 9629065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of the workload in seated and standing horizontal submaximal lifting tasks.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1859-66. PubMed ID: 7671863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.