These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22130355)
1. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Cheng T; Pan XY; Mao X; Zhang GY; Zhang XL Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 22130355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation]. Jenny JY; Boeri C Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Nov; 87(7):645-52. PubMed ID: 11845067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study. Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis. Rebal BA; Babatunde OM; Lee JH; Geller JA; Patrick DA; Macaulay W J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):938-44. PubMed ID: 24140274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Outcomes After Computer-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Xie C; Liu K; Xiao L; Tang R Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e647-53. PubMed ID: 22588405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of stability after total knee arthroplasties between navigation system and conventional techniques. Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Cho SG; Yim JH J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 18078877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty]. Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Seon JK; Song EK J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Computer-Assisted vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High-Quality, Prospective Studies. Panjwani TR; Mullaji A; Doshi K; Thakur H J Arthroplasty; 2019 Mar; 34(3):586-593. PubMed ID: 30611520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Martin A; Wohlgenannt O; Prenn M; Oelsch C; von Strempel A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jul; 460():178-84. PubMed ID: 17620811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials. Chin BZ; Seck VMH; Syn NL; Wee IJY; Tan SSH; O'Neill GK J Knee Surg; 2021 May; 34(6):648-658. PubMed ID: 31683347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases]. El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective non-randomized comparative clinical outcome of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty with and without a minimally invasive approach. Leelasestaporn C J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Sep; 94(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 21970198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]