244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22130355)
1. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up.
Cheng T; Pan XY; Mao X; Zhang GY; Zhang XL
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 22130355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation].
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Nov; 87(7):645-52. PubMed ID: 11845067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis.
Rebal BA; Babatunde OM; Lee JH; Geller JA; Patrick DA; Macaulay W
J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):938-44. PubMed ID: 24140274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Outcomes After Computer-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Xie C; Liu K; Xiao L; Tang R
Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e647-53. PubMed ID: 22588405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of stability after total knee arthroplasties between navigation system and conventional techniques.
Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Cho SG; Yim JH
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 18078877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.
Seon JK; Song EK
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
Bové JC
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Computer-Assisted vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High-Quality, Prospective Studies.
Panjwani TR; Mullaji A; Doshi K; Thakur H
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Mar; 34(3):586-593. PubMed ID: 30611520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement.
Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy.
Martin A; Wohlgenannt O; Prenn M; Oelsch C; von Strempel A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jul; 460():178-84. PubMed ID: 17620811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-Navigated versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes from Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials.
Chin BZ; Seck VMH; Syn NL; Wee IJY; Tan SSH; O'Neill GK
J Knee Surg; 2021 May; 34(6):648-658. PubMed ID: 31683347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective non-randomized comparative clinical outcome of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty with and without a minimally invasive approach.
Leelasestaporn C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Sep; 94(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 21970198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
