These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22130481)

  • 1. How are reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity addressed in REACH dossiers?
    Rovida C; Longo F; Rabbit RR
    ALTEX; 2011; 28(4):273-94. PubMed ID: 22130481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical evaluation of the 2011 ECHA reports on compliance with the REACH and CLP regulations and on the use of alternatives to testing on animals for compliance with the REACH regulation.
    Spielmann H; Sauer UG; Mekenyan O
    Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Oct; 39(5):481-93. PubMed ID: 22103941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.
    Scialli AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
    Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():123-38. PubMed ID: 19025336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18333715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.
    Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
    Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
    Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():1-6. PubMed ID: 19025328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
    Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
    Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The way forward in reproductive/developmental toxicity testing.
    Spielmann H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2009 Dec; 37(6):641-56. PubMed ID: 20105000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 2. Experimental aquatic toxicity assays.
    Tarazona JV; Sobanska MA; Cesnaitis R; Sobanski T; Bonnomet V; Versonnen B; De Coen W
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():137-45. PubMed ID: 24291139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).
    Rovida C; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):187-208. PubMed ID: 19907906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 16555955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. REACH testing requirements must not be driven by reproductive toxicity testing.
    Spielmann H; Vogel R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):365-6. PubMed ID: 16945004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiences of the REACH testing proposals system to reduce animal testing.
    Taylor K; Stengel W; Casalegno C; Andrew D
    ALTEX; 2014; 31(2):107-28. PubMed ID: 24609452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated testing strategies for use with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():7-27. PubMed ID: 19025329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modular one-generation reproduction study as a flexible testing system for regulatory safety assessment.
    Vogel R; Seidle T; Spielmann H
    Reprod Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 19808091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for environmental toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():29-42. PubMed ID: 19025330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.