These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22130627)

  • 1. A two-stage strategy to accommodate general patterns of confounding in the design of observational studies.
    Haneuse S; Schildcrout J; Gillen D
    Biostatistics; 2012 Apr; 13(2):274-88. PubMed ID: 22130627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage sampling for etiologic studies. Sample size and power.
    Schaubel D; Hanley J; Collet JP; Bolvin JF; Sharpe C; Morrison HI; Mao Y
    Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 146(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 9290505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power and sample size for observational studies of point exposure effects.
    Shook-Sa BE; Hudgens MG
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):388-398. PubMed ID: 33226116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.
    Baio G; Copas A; Ambler G; Hargreaves J; Beard E; Omar RZ
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():354. PubMed ID: 26282553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-stage case-control studies: precision of parameter estimates and considerations in selecting sample size.
    Hanley JA; Csizmadi I; Collet JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 162(12):1225-34. PubMed ID: 16269581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical power and sample size calculations: A primer for pediatric surgeons.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    J Pediatr Surg; 2020 Jul; 55(7):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 31155391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian clinical trial design using historical data that inform the treatment effect.
    Psioda MA; Ibrahim JG
    Biostatistics; 2019 Jul; 20(3):400-415. PubMed ID: 29547966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power calculations in genetic studies.
    Evans DM; Purcell S
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2012 Jun; 2012(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 22661434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and sample size calculations for generalized regression models with covariate measurement error.
    Tosteson TD; Buzas JS; Demidenko E; Karagas M
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1069-82. PubMed ID: 12652554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size importantly limits the usefulness of instrumental variable methods, depending on instrument strength and level of confounding.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; le Cessie S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25124167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal pilots for observational studies.
    Gurka MJ; Coffey CS; Gurka KK
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):590-603. PubMed ID: 20857422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size determination for estimating antibody seroconversion rate under stable malaria transmission intensity.
    Sepúlveda N; Drakeley C
    Malar J; 2015 Apr; 14():141. PubMed ID: 25889960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: observational studies with case-control design.
    Martínez D; Papuzinski C; Stojanova J; Arancibia M
    Medwave; 2019 Nov; 19(10):e7716. PubMed ID: 31821315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies for power calculations in predictive biomarker studies in survival data.
    Chen DT; Huang PY; Lin HY; Haura EB; Antonia SJ; Cress WD; Gray JE
    Oncotarget; 2016 Dec; 7(49):80373-80381. PubMed ID: 27661007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size calculations for designing clinical proteomic profiling studies using mass spectrometry.
    Nyangoma SO; Collins SI; Altman DG; Johnson P; Billingham LJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 2. PubMed ID: 22499705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA
    Cook JA; Julious SA; Sones W; Hampson LV; Hewitt C; Berlin JA; Ashby D; Emsley R; Fergusson DA; Walters SJ; Wilson EC; MacLennan G; Stallard N; Rothwell JC; Bland M; Brown L; Ramsay CR; Cook A; Armstrong D; Altman D; Vale LD
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(60):1-88. PubMed ID: 31661431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation study comparing exposure matching with regression adjustment in an observational safety setting with group sequential monitoring.
    Stratton KG; Cook AJ; Jackson LA; Nelson JC
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1117-33. PubMed ID: 25510526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
    ; Le TG; Ngo L; Mehta S; Do VD; Thach TQ; Vu XD; Nguyen DT; Cohen A
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Jun; (169):5-72; discussion 73-83. PubMed ID: 22849236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for twin births in sample size calculations for randomised trials.
    Yelland LN; Sullivan TR; Collins CT; Price DJ; McPhee AJ; Lee KJ
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 32(4):380-387. PubMed ID: 29727020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.