BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22132636)

  • 1. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part II].
    Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Oct; 76(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 22132636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part I].
    Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Sep; 76(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22026069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The current staging for uterine body malignancies and its importance for clinical practice].
    Sehnal B; Benková K; Kmoníčková E; Driák D; Spůrková Z; Maxová K; Sláma J
    Cesk Patol; 2014 Apr; 50(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 24758507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Revised FIGO staging systems for gynecologic malignancies--2009 update].
    Zalewski K; Doniec J; Baranowski W; Bidziński M
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):778-82. PubMed ID: 21117307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TNM classification of gynaecological malignant tumours, eighth edition: changes between the seventh and eighth editions.
    Tokunaga H; Shimada M; Ishikawa M; Yaegashi N
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):311-320. PubMed ID: 30668753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The reasons of changes in revised staging for carcinoma of the vulva].
    Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Maxová K; Koutníková H; Driák D; Neumannová H; Bolehovská P; Sláma J
    Klin Onkol; 2013; 26(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 24107153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
    Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Changes in the TNM classification of gynecological tumors].
    Horn LC; Beckmann MW; Beller A; Schmidt D; Ulrich U; Hantschmann P; Wittekind C
    Pathologe; 2010 Sep; 31(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 20844876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. History of the FIGO cancer staging system.
    Odicino F; Pecorelli S; Zigliani L; Creasman WT
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 May; 101(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18199437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prognostic factors of mesenchymal and mixed tumors of uterus].
    Spacek J; Laco J; Petera J; Jílek P; Krepinská E; Rezác A; Stipl S
    Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Aug; 74(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 20564985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology.
    Benedet JL; Bender H; Jones H; Ngan HY; Pecorelli S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Aug; 70(2):209-62. PubMed ID: 11041682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Problematic issues in the staging of endometrial, cervical and vulval carcinomas.
    Hirschowitz L; Nucci M; Zaino RJ
    Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(1):176-202. PubMed ID: 23240675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [TNM classification of gynecological tumors].
    Kato T; Hasumi K
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Apr; 25(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 9571979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Histological and clinical classification of gynecological tumours].
    Moriwaki S
    Gan No Rinsho; 1990 Aug; 36(10):1095-105. PubMed ID: 2214145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Issues and inconsistencies in the revised gynecologic staging systems.
    Cole L; Stoler MH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 23062423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a revision needed of the current FIGO staging system?
    Menczer J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Oct; 96(10):1159-1161. PubMed ID: 28718876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.
    Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M
    Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staging of uterine sarcomas.
    Tse KY; Crawford R; Ngan HY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Dec; 25(6):733-49. PubMed ID: 21752716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Uterine sarcomas: clinical and histopathological aspects. Report on 15 cases].
    Leung F; Terzibachian JJ; Aouar Z; Govyadovskiy A; Lassabe C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 18538624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
    Tse KY; Ngan HY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.