These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22132636)

  • 1. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part II].
    Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Oct; 76(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 22132636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part I].
    Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Sep; 76(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22026069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The current staging for uterine body malignancies and its importance for clinical practice].
    Sehnal B; Benková K; Kmoníčková E; Driák D; Spůrková Z; Maxová K; Sláma J
    Cesk Patol; 2014 Apr; 50(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 24758507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Revised FIGO staging systems for gynecologic malignancies--2009 update].
    Zalewski K; Doniec J; Baranowski W; Bidziński M
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):778-82. PubMed ID: 21117307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TNM classification of gynaecological malignant tumours, eighth edition: changes between the seventh and eighth editions.
    Tokunaga H; Shimada M; Ishikawa M; Yaegashi N
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):311-320. PubMed ID: 30668753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The reasons of changes in revised staging for carcinoma of the vulva].
    Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Maxová K; Koutníková H; Driák D; Neumannová H; Bolehovská P; Sláma J
    Klin Onkol; 2013; 26(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 24107153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
    Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Changes in the TNM classification of gynecological tumors].
    Horn LC; Beckmann MW; Beller A; Schmidt D; Ulrich U; Hantschmann P; Wittekind C
    Pathologe; 2010 Sep; 31(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 20844876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. History of the FIGO cancer staging system.
    Odicino F; Pecorelli S; Zigliani L; Creasman WT
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 May; 101(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 18199437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prognostic factors of mesenchymal and mixed tumors of uterus].
    Spacek J; Laco J; Petera J; Jílek P; Krepinská E; Rezác A; Stipl S
    Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Aug; 74(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 20564985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology.
    Benedet JL; Bender H; Jones H; Ngan HY; Pecorelli S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Aug; 70(2):209-62. PubMed ID: 11041682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Problematic issues in the staging of endometrial, cervical and vulval carcinomas.
    Hirschowitz L; Nucci M; Zaino RJ
    Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(1):176-202. PubMed ID: 23240675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [TNM classification of gynecological tumors].
    Kato T; Hasumi K
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Apr; 25(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 9571979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Histological and clinical classification of gynecological tumours].
    Moriwaki S
    Gan No Rinsho; 1990 Aug; 36(10):1095-105. PubMed ID: 2214145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Issues and inconsistencies in the revised gynecologic staging systems.
    Cole L; Stoler MH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 23062423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a revision needed of the current FIGO staging system?
    Menczer J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Oct; 96(10):1159-1161. PubMed ID: 28718876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.
    Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M
    Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staging of uterine sarcomas.
    Tse KY; Crawford R; Ngan HY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Dec; 25(6):733-49. PubMed ID: 21752716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Uterine sarcomas: clinical and histopathological aspects. Report on 15 cases].
    Leung F; Terzibachian JJ; Aouar Z; Govyadovskiy A; Lassabe C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):628-35. PubMed ID: 18538624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
    Tse KY; Ngan HY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.