These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22132869)
1. Priming a natural or human-made environment directs attention to context-congruent threatening stimuli. Young SG; Brown CM; Ambady N Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(5):927-33. PubMed ID: 22132869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional modulation of visual-evoked potentials by threat: investigating the effect of evolutionary relevance. Brown C; El-Deredy W; Blanchette I Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 20888109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Of guns and snakes: testing a modern threat superiority effect. Subra B; Muller D; Fourgassie L; Chauvin A; Alexopoulos T Cogn Emot; 2018 Feb; 32(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 28152646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fear, but not fear-relevance, modulates reaction times in visual search with animal distractors. Soares SC; Esteves F; Flykt A J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Jan; 23(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18565724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: how specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Blanchette I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1484-504. PubMed ID: 16846972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch. Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement. Massar SA; Mol NM; Kenemans JL; Baas JM Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):805-17. PubMed ID: 21824022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence. Purkis HM; Lipp OV Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 17516810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: are guns noticed as quickly as snakes? Fox E; Griggs L; Mouchlianitis E Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):691-6. PubMed ID: 18039035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures. Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D; Ohman A Behav Res Ther; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1032-42. PubMed ID: 19695561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Koster EH; Crombez G; Van Damme S; Verschuere B; De Houwer J Emotion; 2004 Sep; 4(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 15456400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Better safe than sorry: simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention. Forbes SJ; Purkis HM; Lipp OV Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):794-804. PubMed ID: 21824021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conserved evolutionary history for quick detection of threatening faces. Kawai N; Kubo K; Masataka N; Hayakawa S Anim Cogn; 2016 May; 19(3):655-60. PubMed ID: 26714818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise. Emotion; ; . PubMed ID: 21707142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]