These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2213313)

  • 1. Comparison of functional recovery after nonsurgical and surgical treatment of condylar fractures.
    Takenoshita Y; Ishibashi H; Oka M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Nov; 48(11):1191-5. PubMed ID: 2213313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures.
    Palmieri C; Ellis E; Throckmorton G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jul; 57(7):764-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 10416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of open and closed treatment of condylar fractures: a change in philosophy.
    De Riu G; Gamba U; Anghinoni M; Sesenna E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 30(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 11720039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of different treatment protocols for fractures of condylar process of mandible.
    Gupta M; Iyer N; Das D; Nagaraj J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 21549492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of fractures of the articular process of the mandible.
    Hidding J; Wolf R; Pingel D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 20(8):345-7. PubMed ID: 1464684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mandibular condyle fractures: conservative treatment versus surgical treatment].
    Moritz M; Niederdellmann H; Dammer R
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1994; 95(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 7939355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscope-assisted transoral reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures--a prospective double-center study.
    Kokemueller H; Konstantinovic VS; Barth EL; Goldhahn S; von See C; Tavassol F; Essig H; Gellrich NC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):384-95. PubMed ID: 21664746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal fixation of severely displaced mandibular condylar neck fracture with the aid of ramus osteotomy. A revised technique.
    Hillerup S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Aug; 26(4):272-4. PubMed ID: 9258717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Method to determine when open treatment of condylar process fractures is not necessary.
    Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 19615583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of a pragmatic treatment rationale: open reduction and internal fixation of displaced and dislocated condyle and condylar head fractures and closed reduction of non-displaced, non-dislocated fractures. Part I: condyle and subcondylar fractures.
    Landes CA; Lipphardt R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):859-70. PubMed ID: 15979851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fractures of the mandibular condyle: a review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposals.
    Zachariades N; Mezitis M; Mourouzis C; Papadakis D; Spanou A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 34(7):421-32. PubMed ID: 17055280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dislocated pediatric condyle fractures - should conservative treatment always be the rule?
    Vesnaver A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 48(10):933-941. PubMed ID: 32919835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional reconstruction of the TM joint in cases of severely displaced fractures and fracture dislocation.
    Umstadt HE; Ellers M; Müller HH; Austermann KH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 28(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10958422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional outcomes following surgical treatment of bilateral mandibular condylar fractures.
    Chen CT; Feng CH; Tsay PK; Lai JP; Chen YR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20961735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated mandibular condyle fractures versus open reposition and rigid fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures in children.
    Landes CA; Day K; Glasl B; Ludwig B; Sader R; Kovács AF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1184-93. PubMed ID: 18486783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening.
    Ishihama K; Iida S; Kimura T; Koizumi H; Yamazawa M; Kogo M
    Cranio; 2007 Jan; 25(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17304913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rigid versus semirigid fixation for condylar fracture: experience with the external fixation system.
    Cascone P; Spallaccia F; Fatone FM; Rivaroli A; Saltarel A; Iannetti G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 18201607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current consensus on the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle. A method by questionnaire.
    Baker AW; McMahon J; Moos KF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Aug; 27(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 9698171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open versus closed treatment of unilateral moderately displaced mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Liu Y; Bai N; Song G; Zhang X; Hu J; Zhu S; Luo E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 23663989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fracture injuries of the mandibular arch. A repair technic].
    Ferri J; Bedhet N; Gordeeff A; Mercier J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1989; 90(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 2762742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.