These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22133340)

  • 21. An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.
    Bueno M; Fabrigoule C; Deleurence P; Ndiaye D; Fort A
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():69-79. PubMed ID: 22765914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hazard perception as a function of target location and the field of view.
    Shahar A; Alberti CF; Clarke D; Crundall D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1577-84. PubMed ID: 20728606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adapting ISA system warnings to enhance user acceptance.
    Jiménez F; Liang Y; Aparicio F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():37-48. PubMed ID: 22664666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Driver behaviour at rail level crossings: responses to flashing lights, traffic signals and stop signs in simulated rural driving.
    Lenné MG; Rudin-Brown CM; Navarro J; Edquist J; Trotter M; Tomasevic N
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 20926063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing effectiveness of various auditory warning signals in maintaining drivers' attention in virtual reality-based driving environments.
    Lin CT; Chiu TT; Huang TY; Chao CF; Liang WC; Hsu SH; Ko LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):825-35. PubMed ID: 19725318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Driver perceptions of the safety implications of quiet electric vehicles.
    Cocron P; Krems JF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():122-31. PubMed ID: 23727553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Verbal collision avoidance messages during simulated driving: perceived urgency, alerting effectiveness and annoyance.
    Baldwin CL
    Ergonomics; 2011 Apr; 54(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 21491275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conspicuity, memorability, comprehension, and priming in road hazard warning signs.
    Charlton SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 May; 38(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 16386230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A method to investigate drivers' acceptance of Blind Spot Detection System®.
    Piccinini G; Simões A; Rodrigues CM; Leitão M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4213-7. PubMed ID: 22317368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers.
    Sagberg F; Bjørnskau T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 16313881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Car Gestures - Advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles.
    Maag C; Schneider N; Lübbeke T; Weisswange TH; Goerick C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():143-53. PubMed ID: 26264518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: the effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance.
    Wiese EE; Lee JD
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jul; 47(9):965-86. PubMed ID: 15204273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An adaptive driver support system: user experiences and driving performance in a simulator.
    Dijksterhuis C; Stuiver A; Mulder B; Brookhuis KA; de Waard D
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):772-85. PubMed ID: 23156622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Requirements of a system to reduce car-to-vulnerable road user crashes in urban intersections.
    Habibovic A; Davidsson J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1570-80. PubMed ID: 21545892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Car drivers' perceptions of electronic stability control (ESC) systems.
    Vadeby A; Wiklund M; Forward S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 21376858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Video-based road commentary training improves hazard perception of young drivers in a dual task.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ; Williamson AR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 19393791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to present collision warnings at intersections?--a comparison of different approaches.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 52():91-9. PubMed ID: 23305968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.