These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22133394)

  • 1. The effect of E-glass fibers and acrylic resin thickness on fracture load in a simulated implant-supported overdenture prosthesis.
    Fajardo RS; Pruitt LA; Finzen FC; Marshall GW; Singh S; Curtis DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 22133394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic and static strength of an implant-supported overdenture model reinforced with metal and nonmetal strengtheners.
    Rached RN; de Souza EM; Dyer SR; Ferracane JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):297-304. PubMed ID: 22024179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture force, deflection, and toughness of acrylic denture repairs involving glass fiber reinforcement.
    Kostoulas I; Kavoura VT; Frangou MJ; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 18086141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of two methods of reinforcement on the fracture strength of interim fixed partial dentures.
    Fahmy NZ; Sharawi A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 19432757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength comparison of four techniques to secure implant attachment housings to complete dentures.
    Domingo KB; Burgess JO; Litaker MS; McCracken MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jul; 110(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23849608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pre- and postpolymerization on flexural strength and elastic modulus of impregnated, fiber-reinforced denture base acrylic resins.
    Bertassoni LE; Marshall GW; de Souza EM; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):449-57. PubMed ID: 19033029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different reinforcements on the fracture toughness of materials for interim restorations.
    Geerts GA; Overturf JH; Oberholzer TG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):461-7. PubMed ID: 18514668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of FRC reinforcing on flexural strength of acrylic resin denture bases.
    Gharehchahi J; Aghdaee NA; Kermani N
    N Y State Dent J; 2010 Nov; 76(6):40-3. PubMed ID: 21226406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of embedded metal reinforcements and their location on the fracture resistance of acrylic resin complete dentures.
    Yoshida K; Takahashi Y; Shimizu H
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 21627707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of implant abutment angulations and two types of fibers on the fracture resistance of ceramage single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 22672144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of two different fiber reinforcements on the fracture toughness of provisional restorative resins.
    Kamble VD; Parkhedkar RD
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 22945699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of length and concentration of glass fibers on the mechanical properties of an injection- and a compression-molded denture base polymer.
    Karacaer O; Polat TN; Tezvergil A; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 14564293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers.
    Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 10050121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
    Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of placement of glass fibers and aramid fibers on the fracture resistance of provisional restorative materials.
    Saygili G; Sahmali SM; Demirel F
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 12540123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different cantilever extensions and glass or polyaramide reinforcement fibers on fracture strength of implant-supported temporary.
    Colán Guzmán P; Freitas FF; Ferreira PM; Freitas CA; Reis KR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 19089201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.