These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2213345)

  • 1. A quantitative assessment of cross-sectional cortical bone remodeling in the femoral diaphysis following hip arthroplasty in elderly females.
    Torchia ME; Ruff CB
    J Orthop Res; 1990 Nov; 8(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 2213345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical bone density of the proximal femur following cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    McGovern TF; Engh CA; Zettl-Schaffer K; Hooten JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):145-54. PubMed ID: 8070187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Otto Aufranc Award. Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement.
    Maloney WJ; Sychterz C; Bragdon C; McGovern T; Jasty M; Engh CA; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Dec; (333):15-26. PubMed ID: 8981879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of cortical bone remodeling with a new ultrasonic technique.
    Zimmerman MC; Meunier A; Katz JL; Christel P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 May; 37(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 2188899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating human long bone cross-sectional geometric properties: a comparison of noninvasive methods.
    O'Neill MC; Ruff CB
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Oct; 47(4):221-35. PubMed ID: 15454334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.
    Högler W; Blimkie CJ; Cowell CT; Inglis D; Rauch F; Kemp AF; Wiebe P; Duncan CS; Farpour-Lambert N; Woodhead HJ
    Bone; 2008 May; 42(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 18337201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of total hip arthroplasty on the structural and biomechanical properties of adult bone.
    Peck JJ; Stout SD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Feb; 138(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 18773467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after Mueller and Zweymueller total hip arthroplasties.
    Korovessis P; Piperos G; Michael A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):214-21. PubMed ID: 7994964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
    Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex- and race-related differences in cross-sectional geometry and bone density of the femoral mid-shaft in older adults.
    Taaffe DR; Lang TF; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt MC; Harris TB
    Ann Hum Biol; 2003; 30(3):329-46. PubMed ID: 12850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Femoral densitometry as potential preoperative indicator for cementation of hip prosthesis].
    Baruffaldi F; Barbanti Brodano G; Testoni M; Gnudi S; Paderni S; Toni A; Giunti A
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 8975301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
    Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.
    Noble PC; Box GG; Kamaric E; Fink MJ; Alexander JW; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):31-44. PubMed ID: 7634721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: Ontogeny.
    Ruff CB; Walker A; Trinkaus E
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 Jan; 93(1):35-54. PubMed ID: 8141241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs.
    Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evaluation of two references for restoring proximal femoral anatomy during total hip arthroplasty.
    Unnanuntana A; Toogood P; Hart D; Cooperman D; Grant RE
    Clin Anat; 2010 Apr; 23(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 20069639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of bone remodeling about orthopaedic implants with ultrasound.
    Zimmerman MC; Meunier A; Katz JL; Christel P; Sedel L
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 2661785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.