These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22133955)

  • 1. Combined 3-dimensional and mirror-image analysis for the diagnosis of asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):886-94. PubMed ID: 22133955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Facial asymmetry: the benefits of cone beam computerized tomography].
    Oosterkamp BC; Damstra J; Jansma J
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2010 May; 117(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 20506903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flip-registration procedure of three-dimensional laser surface scanning images on quantitative evaluation of facial asymmetries.
    Yu Z; Mu X; Feng S; Han J; Chang T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 19165015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry.
    Hwang HS; Hwang CH; Lee KH; Kang BC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 17169741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.
    Katsumata A; Fujishita M; Maeda M; Ariji Y; Ariji E; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 15660095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    De Riu G; Meloni SM; Baj A; Corda A; Soma D; Tullio A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 24418178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging.
    Swennen GR; Mollemans W; Schutyser F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2080-92. PubMed ID: 19761902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mirror imaging and preshaped titanium plates in the treatment of unilateral malar and zygomatic arch fractures.
    Feng F; Wang H; Guan X; Tian W; Jing W; Long J; Tang W; Liu L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 21216634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of cephalometric landmarks with 3-dimensional volumetric computer modeling to position an auricular implant surgical template: a clinical report.
    Kolodney H; Swedenburg G; Taylor SS; Carron JD; Schlakman BN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 22024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics.
    Nervina JM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():95-102. PubMed ID: 22376101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam computed tomography: strengths, weaknesses, and controversies.
    Geist JR
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2011 Mar; 93(3):48-62. PubMed ID: 21526729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis.
    Kau CH; Li JL; Li Q; Abou Kheir N
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):653-69. PubMed ID: 24993927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional photographic analysis of outcome after helmet treatment of a nonsynostotic cranial deformity.
    Schaaf H; Malik CY; Streckbein P; Pons-Kuehnemann J; Howaldt HP; Wilbrand JF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1677-82. PubMed ID: 21119399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kook YA; Kim Y
    J Clin Orthod; 2011 Feb; 45(2):112-5; quiz 92. PubMed ID: 21710882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography-based virtual treatment planning and fabrication of a surgical splint for asymmetric patients: surgery first approach.
    Uribe F; Janakiraman N; Shafer D; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):748-58. PubMed ID: 24182591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone beam computed tomography data.
    Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Amadori S; Sarti A; Marchetti C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20561464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
    Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.