82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22134121)
21. Clinical Relevance of Uterine Manipulation on Oncologic Outcome in Robot-Assisted versus Open Surgery in the Management of Endometrial Cancer.
Eoh KJ; Kim YN; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim YT
J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36902743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study.
Coronado PJ; Rychlik A; Baquedano L; García-Pineda V; Martínez-Maestre MA; Querleu D; Zapardiel I
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Feb; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 35205829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.
Tomov ST; Gorchev GA; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova NH; Tomova VD; Gorcheva ZV; Ahmad S
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1367-1382. PubMed ID: 35142980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative Survival Outcome of Robot-Assisted Staging Surgery Using Three Robotic Arms versus Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.
Eoh KJ; Lee DW; Lee JH; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Jan; 62(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 33381936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic vs. open surgery in obese women with low-grade endometrial cancer: comparison of costs and quality of life measures.
Sofer A; Magnezi R; Eitan R; Raban O; Tal O; Smorgic N; Vaknin Z
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2020 Nov; 9(1):60. PubMed ID: 33138857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Challenges of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients and How to Optimize Success.
Menderes G; Gysler SM; Vadivelu N; Silasi DA
Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2019 Jul; 23(7):51. PubMed ID: 31263977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Barriers to care for women with low-grade endometrial cancer and morbid obesity: a qualitative study.
Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Han A; Hayeems R; Bernardini MQ; Robertson D; Kives SL; Satkunaratnam A; Baxter NN; Ferguson SE
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e026872. PubMed ID: 31248922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection.
Sucandy I; Attili A; Spence J; Bordeau T; Ross S; Rosemurgy A
J Robot Surg; 2020 Feb; 14(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 30707422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association between Obesity, Surgical Route, and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Uterine Cancer.
Al Sawah E; Salemi JL; Hoffman M; Imudia AN; Mikhail E
Minim Invasive Surg; 2018; 2018():5130856. PubMed ID: 30018822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anaesthetic management of robotic-assisted gynaecology surgery in the morbidly obese - A case series of 46 patients in a UK university teaching hospital.
Sadashivaiah J; Ahmed D; Gul N
Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 62(6):443-448. PubMed ID: 29962526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome of Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy in Obese Patients.
Paun D; Petris R; Ganescu R; Paun S; Vartic M; Beuran M
Maedica (Bucur); 2015 Sep; 10(3):231-236. PubMed ID: 28261359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in a university setting.
Walters Haygood CL; Fauci JM; Huddleston-Colburn MK; Huh WK; Straughn JM
J Robot Surg; 2014 Sep; 8(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 27637679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Impact of Obesity on Surgical Outcome in Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.
Orekoya O; Samson ME; Trivedi T; Vyas S; Steck SE
J Gynecol Surg; 2016 Jun; 32(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 27274182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology.
Barber EL; Van Le L
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Dec; 70(12):780-92. PubMed ID: 26676149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The roles and limitations of robotic surgery for obese endometrial cancer patients: a common challenge in gynecologic oncology.
Shemshedini T; Pradhan TS; Pua TL; Tedjarati SS
J Robot Surg; 2015 Jun; 9(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 26531110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Blikkendaal MD; Schepers EM; van Zwet EW; Twijnstra AR; Jansen FW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):723-38. PubMed ID: 25773357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial in viscerally obese patients compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy?
Park JY; Ryu KW; Reim D; Eom BW; Yoon HM; Rho JY; Choi IJ; Kim YW
World J Surg; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1789-97. PubMed ID: 25670040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic hysterectomy strategies in the morbidly obese patient.
Almeida OD
JSLS; 2013; 17(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 24018079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
