These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22134270)

  • 1. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
    Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
    Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures.
    Kenney R; Richards MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 9813806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
    Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
    do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cement-retained bar attachment system for implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Ozcelik TB; Ozcelik O; Pektas ZO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 17547953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
    Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
    Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.