These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22135566)

  • 21. Biomedical journals in Republic of Macedonia: the current state.
    Polenakovic M; Danevska L
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):43-50. PubMed ID: 25711221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet.
    Jefferson T; Smith R; Yee Y; Drummond M; Pratt M; Gale R
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 9676680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors impacting time to acceptance and publication for peer-reviewed publications.
    Toroser D; Carlson J; Robinson M; Gegner J; Girard V; Smette L; Nilsen J; O'Kelly J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 27977312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Early Impact of an Administrative Processing Fee on Manuscript Submissions at The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.
    Nwachukwu BU; Schairer WW; So C; Bernstein JL; Herndon J; Dodwell ER
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(19):e82. PubMed ID: 27707856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias.
    Smulders YM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):946-7. PubMed ID: 23845183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resumed Publication of
    Lin SK; McPhee DJ
    Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2009 Apr; 2(1):1. PubMed ID: 27713218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.
    Kovanis M; Porcher R; Ravaud P; Trinquart L
    Scientometrics; 2016; 106():695-715. PubMed ID: 26855456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. JOURNAL CLUB: Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways.
    Taylor DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):712-720. PubMed ID: 28125269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ultimate publication rate of unpublished manuscripts listed on radiology residency applications at one institution.
    Grimm LJ; Maxfield CM
    Acad Med; 2013 Nov; 88(11):1719-22. PubMed ID: 24072127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.
    Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.