365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22136216)
41. Robotic surgery: gynecologic oncology.
Krill LS; Bristow RE
Cancer J; 2013; 19(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 23528726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
Advincula AP
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Robotic single port total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer patients.
Mereu L; Carri G; Khalifa H
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Dec; 127(3):644. PubMed ID: 22871468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Innovations in minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Ridgeway B; Falcone T
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 24145361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature.
Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Utilization of and charges for robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Yu X; Lum D; Kiet TK; Fuh KC; Orr J; Brooks RA; Ueda SM; Chen LM; Kapp DS; Chan JK
J Surg Oncol; 2013 May; 107(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 23129514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion.
Zehnder P; Gill IS
Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Sep; 21(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 21814054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
Rassweiler J; Frede T
Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
Barnett JC; Judd JP; Wu JM; Scales CD; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):685-693. PubMed ID: 20733453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Role of laparoscopic hysterectomy in the management of endometrial cancer.
Seracchioli R; Mabrouk M; Manuzzi L; Savelli L; Venturoli S
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 20(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 18660684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008.
Murphy DG; Hall R; Tong R; Goel R; Costello AJ
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Dec; 78(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 19087046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
