These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22137015)

  • 1. Response-repetition costs in task switching: how they are modulated by previous-trial response-category activation.
    Grzyb KR; Hübner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 22137015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Excessive response-repetition costs under task switching: how response inhibition amplifies response conflict.
    Grzyb KR; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 22612160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.
    Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct response components indicate that binding is the primary cause of response repetition effects.
    Hydock C; Patai EZ; Sohn MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1598-611. PubMed ID: 23647336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings.
    Schneider DW; Verbruggen F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1629-40. PubMed ID: 18609408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():165-73. PubMed ID: 20573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.
    Hsieh S; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():116-25. PubMed ID: 18314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis.
    Burle B; Possamaï CA; Vidal F; Bonnet M; Hasbroucq T
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 12466929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The target of task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 20565179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlates of stimulus-response congruence in the posterior parietal cortex.
    Stoet G; Snyder LH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 17280509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.