These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22137334)
1. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis. Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis. Vos MD; Baas EM; de Lange J; Bierenbroodspot F Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies during adolescence. den Besten CA; Mensink G; van Merkesteyn JP J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):e78-82. PubMed ID: 23253633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjective alveolar nerve function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of mandible. Baas EM; Horsthuis RB; de Lange J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 21763047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion. Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term hard and soft tissue relapse rate after genioplasty. Talebzadeh N; Pogrel MA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11174590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications. Ow A; Cheung LK Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 39(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 20452186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature. Schreuder WH; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Vissink A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 17270397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Lee SH; Kaban LB; Lahey ET J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 25622883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial. Baas EM; Bierenbroodspot F; de Lange J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 25595452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Wijbenga JG; Verlinden CR; Jansma J; Becking AG; Stegenga B Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 19394196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal and dental stability of segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up. Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 22356741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the long-term skeletal stability between a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system following BSSO advancement - a cohort study based on a multicenter randomised controlled trial. van Bakelen NB; Boermans BD; Buijs GJ; Jansma J; Pruim GJ; Hoppenreijs TJ; Bergsma JE; Stegenga B; Bos RR Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 52(8):721-8. PubMed ID: 25138611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidence-based review. Ow A; Cheung LK J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2344-53. PubMed ID: 19837301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis. Baas EM; de Lange J; Horsthuis RB Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 20430586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better? Ow AT; Cheung LK Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse. Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]