These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22138127)

  • 1. Beyond readability: investigating coherence of clinical text for consumers.
    Smith CA; Hetzel S; Dalrymple P; Keselman A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e104. PubMed ID: 22138127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A user-study measuring the effects of lexical simplification and coherence enhancement on perceived and actual text difficulty.
    Leroy G; Kauchak D; Mouradi O
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Aug; 82(8):717-30. PubMed ID: 23639262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Wu DT; Hanauer DA; Mei Q; Clark PM; An LC; Proulx J; Zeng QT; Vydiswaran VG; Collins-Thompson K; Zheng K
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 26269536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of readability in effective health communication: an experiment using a Japanese health information text on chronic suppurative otitis media.
    Sakai Y
    Health Info Libr J; 2013 Sep; 30(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 23981023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Text Comprehensibility of Hospital Report Cards].
    Sander U; Kolb B; Christoph C; Emmert M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Dec; 78(12):828-834. PubMed ID: 25806505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].
    Esfahani BJ; Faron A; Roth KS; Schaller HE; Medved F; Lüers JC
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 25412241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond surface characteristics: a new health text-specific readability measurement.
    Kim H; Goryachev S; Rosemblat G; Browne A; Keselman A; Zeng-Treitler Q
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():418-22. PubMed ID: 18693870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. User Engagement Among Diverse Adults in a 12-Month Text Message-Delivered Diabetes Support Intervention: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nelson LA; Spieker A; Greevy R; LeStourgeon LM; Wallston KA; Mayberry LS
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17534. PubMed ID: 32706738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.
    Calloway RC; Helder A; Perfetti CA
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):899-931. PubMed ID: 35505178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing readability of consumer health information: an exploratory study.
    Gemoets D; Rosemblat G; Tse T; Logan R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):869-73. PubMed ID: 15360936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.
    Keselman A; Smith CA
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Dec; 45(6):1151-63. PubMed ID: 22925723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving Consumer Understanding of Medical Text: Development and Validation of a New SubSimplify Algorithm to Automatically Generate Term Explanations in English and Spanish.
    Kloehn N; Leroy G; Kauchak D; Gu Y; Colina S; Yuan NP; Revere D
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Aug; 20(8):e10779. PubMed ID: 30072361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Languages for different health information readers: multitrait-multimethod content analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews textual summary formats.
    Karačić J; Dondio P; Buljan I; Hren D; Marušić A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):75. PubMed ID: 30953453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing consumer health vocabulary familiarity: an exploratory study.
    Keselman A; Tse T; Crowell J; Browne A; Ngo L; Zeng Q
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):e5. PubMed ID: 17478414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of the Text Simplification on Understanding.
    Ivchenko O; Grabar N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():634-638. PubMed ID: 35612166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User evaluation of the effects of a text simplification algorithm using term familiarity on perception, understanding, learning, and information retention.
    Leroy G; Endicott JE; Kauchak D; Mouradi O; Just M
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Jul; 15(7):e144. PubMed ID: 23903235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When synonyms are not enough: Optimal parenthetical insertion for text simplification.
    Gu Y; Leroy G; Kauchak D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():810-819. PubMed ID: 29854147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].
    Seidel G; Münch I; Dreier M; Borutta B; Walter U; Dierks ML
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Mar; 57(3):366-79. PubMed ID: 24562713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Vocabulary Intervention on Text Comprehension: Who Benefits?
    Duff D
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Oct; 50(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.