These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22138723)
21. Preventing ultimate harm as the justification for biomoral modification. Murphy TF Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 25186171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. True to oneself? Broad and narrow ideas on authenticity in the enhancement debate. Bolt LL Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(4):285-300. PubMed ID: 17909988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Why we can't really say what post-persons are. Agar N J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):144-5. PubMed ID: 22174330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Ethical Reflections on Genetic Enhancement with the Aim of Enlarging Altruism. DeGrazia D Health Care Anal; 2016 Sep; 24(3):180-95. PubMed ID: 26246070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Moral bioenhancement and the utilitarian catastrophe. Agar N Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25473856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles. Dawson A; Garrard E J Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 32(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 16574872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cognitive diversity and moral enhancement. Gyngell C; Easteal S Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 25473859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Queen Christina's moral claim on the living: justification of a tenacious moral intuition. Masterton M; Helgesson G; Höglund AT; Hansson MG Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Sep; 10(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 17279433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reshaping human intelligence: the debate about genetic enhancement of cognitive functions. Fuchs M Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2010; 16(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 22533034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Parental wisdom, empirical blindness, and normative evaluation of prenatal genetic enhancement. Tonkens R J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 21597084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reevaluating Benefits in the Moral Justification of Animal Research: A Comment on "Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research". Eggel M; Neuhaus CP; Grimm H Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jan; 29(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 31858941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The new enhancement technologies and the place of vulnerability in our lives. Quilter JG Theor Med Bioeth; 2016 Feb; 37(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 26935438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reproductive choice, enhancement, and the moral continuum argument. Malmqvist E J Med Philos; 2014 Feb; 39(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24334271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imagining human enhancement: whose future, which rationality? Tomasini F Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(6):497-507. PubMed ID: 18322820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Common ground on surgical abortion?--engaging Peter Singer on the moral status of potential persons. Camosy CC J Med Philos; 2008 Dec; 33(6):577-93. PubMed ID: 19098134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability: a rejoinder to Roberts. Curtis B; Vehmas S J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):266-7. PubMed ID: 26964568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children. Tonkens R J Med Ethics; 2011 Oct; 37(10):606-10. PubMed ID: 21546517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]