These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2213965)

  • 1. [The individualized ANB angle of Chinese adults].
    Yen CH
    Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1990 Aug; 6(8):449-53. PubMed ID: 2213965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric Floating Norms for the
    Perinetti G; Ceschi M; Scalia A; Contardo L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8740731. PubMed ID: 29850584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Study on the Evaluation of Pharyngeal Size in Different Skeletal Patterns: A Radiographic Study.
    Chokotiya H; Banthia A; K SR; Choudhary K; Sharma P; Awasthi N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1278-1283. PubMed ID: 30498186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
    Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of variation of sagittal position of the jaw bones in skeletal Class III malocclusion].
    Stojanović Z; Nikolić P; Nikodijević A; Milić J; Duka M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Dec; 69(12):1039-45. PubMed ID: 23424956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Stabilized position of incisors after orthodontic treatment on reversed occlusion cases with skeletal imbalance. Application of quadrilateral analysis].
    Morita S; Ishii H; Egami K; Ogura H; Kasai K; Seki H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 48(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 2637321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An inference modeling of human visual judgment of sagittal jaw-base relationships based on cephalometry: part I.
    Takada K; Sorihashi Y; Stephens CD; Itoh S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):140-6; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 10672213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic value of profile photography in identifying departures from the norm of growth pattern and horizontal jaw relationship.
    Sajjadi SH; Elmi B; Hajizade N; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):322-331. PubMed ID: 28778724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric Characteristic of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Javanese Population at Universitas Airlangga Dental Hospital.
    Ardani IGAW; Sanjaya ML; Sjamsudin J
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Sep; 9(Suppl 2):S342-S346. PubMed ID: 30294169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 10842115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.
    Chung CH; Mongiovi VD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):670-8. PubMed ID: 14666080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle.
    Sadat-Khonsari R; Dathe H; Knösel M; Hahn W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19322533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dentoalveolar compensation in skeletal Class III patients treated with orthognathic surgery].
    Zhang J; Li X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 50(11):656-60. PubMed ID: 26757759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
    Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Adjustments of FH-SN angle and ANB angle to cephalometric analysis of horizontal jaw relation].
    Deguchi T
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Dec; 41(4):757-64. PubMed ID: 6962820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.