136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22139763)
1. Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Dong T; Tian L; Hutson A; Xiong C
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3532-45. PubMed ID: 22139763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.
Dong T; Kang L; Hutson A; Xiong C; Tian L
Biom J; 2014 Mar; 56(2):270-86. PubMed ID: 24265123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.
Dong T; Tian L
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1215-33. PubMed ID: 25372999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity to the early diseased stage in diagnostic tests.
Hai Y; Shi S; Qin G; For The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging
Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200021. PubMed ID: 36642803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.
Attwood K; Tian L; Xiong C
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):608-33. PubMed ID: 24707966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.
Kang L; Xiong C; Crane P; Tian L
Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):631-43. PubMed ID: 22865796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical likelihood confidence interval for sensitivity to the early disease stage.
Rahman H; Zhao Y;
Pharm Stat; 2022 May; 21(3):566-583. PubMed ID: 34962077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence intervals for differences between volumes under receiver operating characteristic surfaces (VUS) and generalized Youden indices (GYIs).
Yin J; Nakas CT; Tian L; Reiser B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):675-688. PubMed ID: 29233075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
Zhou H; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A nonparametric fiducial interval for the Youden index in multi-state diagnostic settings.
Batterton KA; Schubert CM
Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):78-96. PubMed ID: 26278275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.
Kang L; Xiong C; Tian L
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2013 Dec; 68():. PubMed ID: 24415817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test.
Platt RW; Hanley JA; Yang H
Stat Med; 2000 Feb; 19(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 10649298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence intervals for the symmetry point: an optimal cutpoint in continuous diagnostic tests.
López-Ratón M; Cadarso-Suárez C; Molanes-López EM; Letón E
Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 26756550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests.
He H; McDermott MP
Biostatistics; 2012 Jan; 13(1):32-47. PubMed ID: 21856650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A smooth ROC curve estimator based on log-concave density estimates.
Rufibach K
Int J Biostat; 2012; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22611590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
Li C; Chen J; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity and difference between two sensitivities at a given specificity under tree ordering.
Gao Y; Tian L
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(16):3695-3723. PubMed ID: 33906262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simple nonparametric confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests.
Adimari G; Chiogna M
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 24. PubMed ID: 21969980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
