These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22139769)

  • 21. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.
    Gelman A
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2865-73. PubMed ID: 17960576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Interpretation of research data. Are you also a "statistical analphabet?"].
    Füessl HS
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Oct; 151(44):6-7. PubMed ID: 19957465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tree-based model checking for logistic regression.
    Su X
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2154-69. PubMed ID: 16969891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Statistical models and multivariable analysis].
    Ravani P; Malberti F
    G Ital Nefrol; 2005; 22(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 16267795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Categorized or continuous? Strength of an association and linear regression.
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    J Physiol; 2012 May; 590(9):2061-4. PubMed ID: 22548908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of errors in variables methods for use in regression models with spatially misaligned data.
    Lopiano KK; Young LJ; Gotway CA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Feb; 20(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 20519258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time-dependent predictors in clinical research, performance of a novel method.
    van de Bosch J; Atiqi R; Cleophas TJ
    Am J Ther; 2010; 17(6):e202-7. PubMed ID: 20393346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Significance and Limitations of the p Value.
    Dick F; Tevaearai H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Dec; 50(6):815. PubMed ID: 26342862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Regression modeling strategies].
    Núñez E; Steyerberg EW; Núñez J
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 21531065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Introduction to the use of regression models in epidemiology.
    Bender R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 471():179-95. PubMed ID: 19109780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hansen BB
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2050-4; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18407561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of multiple regression to two latent variable techniques for estimation and prediction.
    Wall MM; Li R
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3671-85. PubMed ID: 14652868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Hill J
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18446836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Roaming through methodology. XXII. Application of techniques for longitudinal data analysis].
    Twisk JW; de Vente W
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(35):1680-3. PubMed ID: 10981236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correction for regression dilution bias using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
    Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Zethelius B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2246-57. PubMed ID: 16969892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.
    Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. PubMed ID: 18286673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How to use difference plots in quantitative method comparison studies.
    Twomey PJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 43(Pt 2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16536914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Correlation and regression].
    Azman J; Frković V; Bilić-Zulle L; Petrovecki M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():81-91. PubMed ID: 16526309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ
    Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(18):2278-94. PubMed ID: 21590792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the agreement between two quantitative assays with repeated measurements.
    Shaoi J; Zhong B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Feb; 14(1):201-12. PubMed ID: 15027509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.