These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22139777)

  • 21. Effectiveness of e-Learning in a Medical School 2.0 Model: Comparison of Item Analysis for Student-Generated vs. Faculty-Generated Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Janzen BW; Sommerfeld C; Gooi ACC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():184-188. PubMed ID: 30741193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum.
    Khalil MK; Nelson LD; Kibble JD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 20814914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities.
    Fischer MR; Kopp V; Holzer M; Ruderich F; Jünger J
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 16147800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Test performance of a local examination at a nonlocal site for evaluation of surgical clerks.
    Dunnington G; Witzke D; Hassett J; Reisner L; Fulginiti J; Rubeck R
    Surgery; 1990 Aug; 108(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 2382223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Item statistics derived from three-option versions of multiple-choice questions are usually as robust as four- or five-option versions: implications for exam design.
    Loudon C; Macias-Muñoz A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Dec; 42(4):565-575. PubMed ID: 30192185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tips for developing a valid and reliable bank of multiple choice questions (MCQs).
    Sadaf S; Khan S; Ali SK
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012; 25(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 23823639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using the tool for assessing cultural competence training (TACCT) to measure faculty and medical student perceptions of cultural competence instruction in the first three years of the curriculum.
    Lie D; Boker J; Cleveland E
    Acad Med; 2006 Jun; 81(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 16728806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An empirical study on the relationship between teacher's judgments and fit statistics of the partial credit model.
    Baek SG; Kim HS
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19299887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics.
    Madhav VN
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1314-9. PubMed ID: 26522636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhanced student experience: an analysis of subjective evaluation and objective learning success after the transformation of a pharmaceutical physiology course.
    Zimmermann M; Eckert GP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Mar; 34(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20237227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions.
    Nedeau-Cayo R; Laughlin D; Rus L; Hall J
    J Nurses Prof Dev; 2013; 29(2):52-7; quiz E1-2. PubMed ID: 23657034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integrating an open-source course management system (Moodle) into the teaching of a first-year medical physiology course: a case study.
    Seluakumaran K; Jusof FF; Ismail R; Husain R
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 22139773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Designing multiple-choice test items at higher cognitive levels.
    Su WM; Osisek PJ; Montgomery C; Pellar S
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(5):223-7. PubMed ID: 19726967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
    Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning styles differ between senior dietetics students and dietetics faculty members.
    Mitchell AW; Nyland NK
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2005 Oct; 105(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 16183362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.