BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22142404)

  • 1. Margin status after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and the index lesion: implications for preoperative evaluation of tumor focality in prostate cancer.
    Karavitakis M; Ahmed HU; Abel PD; Hazell S; Winkler MH
    J Endourol; 2012 May; 26(5):503-8. PubMed ID: 22142404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
    Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Yee DS; Narula N; Amin MB; Skarecky DW; Ahlering TE
    J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1461-5. PubMed ID: 19619065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
    Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
    J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Yang R; Cao K; Han T; Zhang YF; Zhang GT; Xu LF; Lian HB; Li XG; Guo HQ
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 27004537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does intraoperative frozen section really predict significant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? A retrospective study.
    Choi SY; Chi BH; Kim TH; Lim B; Lee W; You D; Kim CS
    Asian J Androl; 2021; 23(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 32362599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
    Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
    Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer.
    Tan WS; Krimphove MJ; Cole AP; Marchese M; Berg S; Lipsitz SR; Löppenberg B; Nabi J; Abdollah F; Choueiri TK; Kibel AS; Sooriakumaran P; Trinh QD
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e1060-e1068. PubMed ID: 31303561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
    Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
    BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
    Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
    Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
    Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer: correlation with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Patel U; Dasgupta P; Challacombe B; Cahill D; Brown C; Patel R; Kirby R
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27153933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.