120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22142404)
21. Value of three-dimensional visualization of preoperative prostatic magnetic resonance imaging based on measurements of anatomical structures in predicting positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.
Fan B; Zhang L; Wang Y; Dai Z; Pan H; Xie J; Wang H; Xin Z; Wang Y; Duan X; Luo J; Wang L; Liu Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1228892. PubMed ID: 37859989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Gillitzer R; Thüroff C; Fandel T; Thomas C; Thüroff JW; Brenner W; Wiesner C; Jones J; Hansen T; Hampel C
BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):755-759. PubMed ID: 20880193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients.
Busch J; Gonzalgo ML; Leva N; Ferrari M; Cash H; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Miller K; Magheli A
World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 24853030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Msezane LP; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
Can J Urol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701. PubMed ID: 17949525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy monotherapy, a more aggressive yet less invasive option, is oncologically effective in selected men with high-risk prostate cancer having only one D'Amico risk factor: experience from an Asian tertiary referral center.
Tai HC; Lai MK; Huang CY; Wang SM; Huang KH; Chen CH; Chung SD; Chueh SC; Yu HJ; Pu YS
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 23987245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Park BH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon SS
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24440235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.
Gacci M; Simonato A; Lanciotti M; Ennas M; Varca V; Maffezzini M; Imbimbo C; Gontero P; Schiavina R; Carini M; Martorana G; Nicita G; Mirone V; Carmignani G
Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23735440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Positive Association between Preoperative Total Testosterone Levels and Risk of Positive Surgical Margins by Prostate Cancer: Results in 476 Consecutive Patients Treated Only by Radical Prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Pocessali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Mariotto A; Inverardi D; Brunelli M; Iacovelli R; Romano M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29975957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [High-risk prostate cancer surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].
Duperron C; Moulin M; Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Cormier L
Prog Urol; 2015 Jun; 25(7):390-5. PubMed ID: 25759079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics.
Shikanov S; Woo J; Al-Ahmadie H; Katz MH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 19616830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ex vivo MRI evaluation of prostate cancer: Localization and margin status prediction of prostate cancer in fresh radical prostatectomy specimens.
Heidkamp J; Hoogenboom M; Kovacs IE; Veltien A; Maat A; Sedelaar JPM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 28580659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The low weight of the prostate is an independent risk factor for positive surgical margins on radical prostatectomy specimens].
Descazeaud A; Zerbib M; Vieillefond A; Debré B; Peyromaure M
Prog Urol; 2007 Apr; 17(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 17489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
