BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2214246)

  • 1. Detection of early visual field change in ocular hypertension using STATPAC.
    Park HJ; Kim DM; Youn DH; Hong C
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2214246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perimetry with a glaucoma-specific test grid. A clinical study with the GG program].
    Roesen B; Gramer E
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Aug; 92(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 7549349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using a screening program of Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Hong C; Song KY; Youn DH; Park WH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2214247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baseline visual field characteristics in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Cello KE; Edwards M; Kass MA; Gordon MO; Budenz DL; Gaasterland DE; Werner E;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):432-7. PubMed ID: 11874743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similarities between the visual fields of ocular hypertensive and normal eyes.
    Katz J; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Nov; 104(11):1648-51. PubMed ID: 3778281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
    Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Drance SM; Gaasterland D; Mills RP; Ashburn F; Hnik P; Van Coevorden RE
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of Goldmann applanation tonometry on automated static threshold perimetry.
    Ruben JB; Lewis RA; Johnson CA; Adams C
    Ophthalmology; 1988 Feb; 95(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 2902545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields.
    Birch MK; Wishart PK; O'Donnell NP
    Ophthalmology; 1995 Aug; 102(8):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. PubMed ID: 9097752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma.
    Stewart WC
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Feb; 70(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1557979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
    Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of early glaucomatous progression with octopus cluster trend analysis.
    Naghizadeh F; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 24892507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.
    Enger C; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Oct; 105(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 3662906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Distribution of retinal sensitivity with blue on yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension].
    Maeda H; Tanaka Y; Sugiura T; Nakamura M; Yamamoto M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Feb; 102(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9513357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
    Nordmann JP; Denis P; Nguer Y; Mouton-Chopin D; Saraux H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1994; 4(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 7950333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blue versus white stimuli in ocular hypertension with the Friedmann Mark 1 Visual Field Analyser.
    Hugkulstone CE; Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 4)():356-60. PubMed ID: 1478305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of weighting the "mean defect" visual field index according to threshold variability in the central and midperipheral visual field.
    Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1991; 229(3):228-31. PubMed ID: 1869056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of the G1 and Octosmart programs in detecting temporal changes in the visual field.
    Fankhauser F; Gloor B; Iliev M; Kalman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 21(6):311-7. PubMed ID: 9869338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.