184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22142498)
1. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MRA (QISS-MRA) of the lower extremities: comparison with contrast-enhanced MRA.
Klasen J; Blondin D; Schmitt P; Bi X; Sansone R; Wittsack HJ; Kröpil P; Quentin M; Kuhlemann J; Miese F; Heiss C; Kelm M; Antoch G; Lanzman RS
Clin Radiol; 2012 May; 67(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 22142498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial experience at 3 T.
Knobloch G; Gielen M; Lauff MT; Romano VC; Schmitt P; Rick M; Kröncke TJ; Huppertz A; Hamm B; Wagner M
Clin Radiol; 2014 May; 69(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24613581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating peripheral arterial disease with unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography at 3 T.
Amin P; Collins JD; Koktzoglou I; Molvar C; Markl M; Edelman RR; Carr JC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):886-93. PubMed ID: 24660721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography (NCE-MRA) of the Calf: A Direct Comparison between Flow-Sensitive Dephasing (FSD) Prepared Steady-State Free Precession (SSFP) and Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot (QISS) in Patients with Diabetes.
Zhang N; Zou L; Huang Y; Liu D; Tang Y; Fan Z; Chen H; Liu X
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128786. PubMed ID: 26035645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3 Tesla in patients with advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Thierfelder KM; Meimarakis G; Nikolaou K; Sommer WH; Schmitt P; Kazmierczak PM; Reiser MF; Theisen D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91078. PubMed ID: 24608937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonenhanced peripheral MR-angiography (MRA) at 3 Tesla: evaluation of quiescent-interval single-shot MRA in patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography.
Wagner M; Knobloch G; Gielen M; Lauff MT; Romano V; Hamm B; Kröncke T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):841-50. PubMed ID: 25697720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography.
Wu G; Yang J; Zhang T; Morelli JN; Giri S; Li X; Tang W
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 27760564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography (MRA) of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease at 3 tesla: Examination time and diagnostic performance of 2D quiescent-interval single-shot MRA vs. 3D fast spin-Echo MRA.
Knobloch G; Lauff MT; Hanke M; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Wagner M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 76():17-25. PubMed ID: 33157187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial evaluation of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease at 7 T.
Fischer A; Maderwald S; Johst S; Orzada S; Ladd ME; Umutlu L; Lauenstein TC; Kniemeyer HW; Nassenstein K
Invest Radiol; 2014 May; 49(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 24637590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quiescent inflow single-shot and native space for nonenhanced peripheral MR angiography.
Ward EV; Galizia MS; Usman A; Popescu AR; Dunkle E; Edelman RR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 38(6):1531-8. PubMed ID: 23564638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pelvic and lower extremity vasculature at 3.0 T: initial experience.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Nijenhuis M; Hellmich M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 18243622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D non-contrast-enhanced ECG-gated MR angiography of the lower extremities with dual-source radiofrequency transmission at 3.0 T: Intraindividual comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in PAOD patients.
Rasper M; Wildgruber M; Settles M; Eckstein HH; Zimmermann A; Reeps C; Rummeny EJ; Huber AM
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):2871-80. PubMed ID: 26560724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-observer comparison study between unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography and invasive carbon dioxide angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease and chronic renal insufficiency.
Arendt CT; Leithner D; Lenga L; Wichmann JL; Albrecht MH; Czwikla R; Varga-Szemes A; d'Angelo T; Martin SS; Thalhammer A; Nagel E; Vogl TJ; Gruber-Rouh T
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():140-146. PubMed ID: 30396647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of non-contrast quiescent-interval single-shot and quiescent-interval single-shot arterial spin-labelled magnetic resonance angiography in assessment of peripheral arterial disease in a diabetic population.
Lam A; Perchyonok Y; Ranatunga D; Lukies MW; Richmond D; Hornsey EK; McColl B; Heidrich J; Ko PH; Spelman T; Chuen J; Edelman RR; Lim RP
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 64(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 32043319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
