These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22142773)

  • 21. Neural processes of attentional inhibition of return traced with magnetoencephalography.
    Ayabe T; Ishizu T; Kojima S; Urakawa T; Nishitani N; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2008 Oct; 156(3):769-80. PubMed ID: 18762232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acute aerobic exercise enhances attentional modulation of somatosensory event-related potentials during a tactile discrimination task.
    Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():267-75. PubMed ID: 25549856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 17485166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition.
    Poliakoff E; O'Boyle DJ; Moore AP; McGlone FP; Cody FW; Spence C
    Brain; 2003 Sep; 126(Pt 9):2081-92. PubMed ID: 12876143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15787854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition-of-return.
    Röder B; Spence C; Rösler F
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 11914791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cue-locked lateralized components in a tactile spatial attention task: Evidence for a functional dissociation between ADAN and LSN.
    Gherri E; Gooray E; Forster B
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 26695445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological modulations of exogenous attention by intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Mar; 85():239-50. PubMed ID: 24463767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 12756516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return?
    Mayer AR; Seidenberg M; Dorflinger JM; Rao SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1262-71. PubMed ID: 15453978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modulation of somatosensory event-related potential components in a tactile-visual cross-modal task.
    Ohara S; Lenz FA; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006; 138(4):1387-95. PubMed ID: 16442738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.