203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22143664)
1. [Comparison of the image quality of conventional and digital radiography in lizards. Mammography technique versus digital detector system].
Bochmann M; Ludewig E; Pees M
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 22143664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative radiography of the respiratory tract of snakes using conventional high-resolution film-screen-system and a digital detector system].
Pees M; Bochmann M; Krautwald-Junghanns ME; Schmidt V; Ludewig E
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2010; 123(5-6):177-85. PubMed ID: 20496822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the image quality of a high-resolution screen-film system and a digital flat panel detector system in avian radiography.
Bochmann M; Ludewig E; Krautwald-Junghanns ME; Pees M
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 21342307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation Dose Reduction in Different Digital Radiography Systems: Impact on Assessment of Defined Bony Structures in Bearded Dragons (
Steiner N; Ludewig E; Tebrün W; Pees M
Animals (Basel); 2023 May; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37238043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative evaluation of six different body regions of the dog using analog and digital radiography].
Meyer-Lindenberg A; Ebermaier C; Wolvekamp P; Tellhelm B; Meutstege FJ; Lang J; Hartung K; Fehr M; Nolte I
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2008; 121(5-6):216-27. PubMed ID: 18557526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.
Völk M; Strotzer M; Holzknecht N; Manke C; Lenhart M; Gmeinwieser J; Link J; Reiser M; Feuerbach S
Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 10964733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector -- a study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization].
Lehnert T; Wohlers J; Streng W; Manegold K; Wetter A; Jacobi V; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 16508834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
