These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22143745)

  • 1. Evaluation of soft tissue attachments to a novel intra-abdominal prosthetic in a rabbit model.
    Dolce CJ; Keller JE; Stefanidis D; Walters KC; Heath JJ; Lincourt AL; Norton HJ; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    Surg Innov; 2012 Sep; 19(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 22143745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model.
    Harrell AG; Novitsky YW; Peindl RD; Cobb WS; Austin CE; Cristiano JA; Norton JH; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    Am Surg; 2006 Sep; 72(9):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 16986391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh.
    Matthews BD; Mostafa G; Carbonell AM; Joels CS; Kercher KW; Austin C; Norton HJ; Heniford BT
    J Surg Res; 2005 Feb; 123(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 15680383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
    Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: a comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes.
    Konerding MA; Chantereau P; Delventhal V; Holste JL; Ackermann M
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):806-16. PubMed ID: 21992970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of intraperitoneal placement of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model.
    Jenkins ED; Melman L; Desai S; Brown SR; Frisella MM; Deeken CR; Matthews BD
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):604-12. PubMed ID: 20652323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective histologic evaluation of intra-abdominal prosthetics four months after implantation in a rabbit model.
    Harrell AG; Novitsky YW; Cristiano JA; Gersin KS; Norton HJ; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1170-4. PubMed ID: 17285375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 120-day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement.
    Pierce RA; Perrone JM; Nimeri A; Sexton JA; Walcutt J; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
    Surg Innov; 2009 Mar; 16(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19124448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite.
    Jacob BP; Hogle NJ; Durak E; Kim T; Fowler DL
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Apr; 21(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 17285369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.
    Burger JW; Halm JA; Wijsmuller AR; ten Raa S; Jeekel J
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1320-5. PubMed ID: 16865616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation.
    Ditzel M; Deerenberg EB; Grotenhuis N; Harlaar JJ; Monkhorst K; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3654-62. PubMed ID: 23549771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh.
    Matthews BD; Pratt BL; Pollinger HS; Backus CL; Kercher KW; Sing RF; Heniford BT
    J Surg Res; 2003 Oct; 114(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 14559437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE OXIDE RESTERILISATION AND IN-VITRO DEGRADATION ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PARTIALLY ABSORBABLE COMPOSITE HERNIA MESHES.
    Endogan T; Ozyaylali I; Kulacoglu H; Serbetci K; Kiyak G; Hasirci N
    East Afr Med J; 2013 Jun; 90(6):195-201. PubMed ID: 26859026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ventral hernia repair with synthetic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile.
    Cevasco M; Itani KM
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2012 Aug; 13(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 22913337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of acute fixation strength of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant.
    Jenkins ED; Melman L; Frisella MM; Deeken CR; Matthews BD
    Hernia; 2010 Oct; 14(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 20454989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.
    Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF
    Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice.
    Orenstein SB; Saberski ER; Kreutzer DL; Novitsky YW
    J Surg Res; 2012 Aug; 176(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 22099590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects.
    Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carrera-San Martín A; Jurado F
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jul; 183(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8673302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sublay repair results in superior mesh incorporation and histological fibrogenesis in comparison to onlay and primary suture in an experimental rat model.
    Ponce Leon F; Manso JEF; Abud VL; Nogueira W; Silva PC; Martinez R
    Hernia; 2018 Dec; 22(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 30168008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human peritoneal membrane controls adhesion formation and host tissue response following intra-abdominal placement in a porcine model.
    Jin J; Voskerician G; Hunter SA; McGee MF; Cavazzola LT; Schomisch S; Harth K; Rosen MJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 19628227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.